Matthias Trute <mtr...@web.de> writes: >> Maybe it is a trivial observation, but I see that 2/ is a bad idea for >> addresses > 32KWhatever (bytes or words) since sign propagation will >> produce an incorrect address. I defined u2/ myself for that purpose. > > Its not the address but the size information. The chances are too little to > hit this bug (you need plenty of external RAM for this).
Hello Matthias, What I expressed support for was adding u2/ to the standard, as recommended by Rafael. People with strictly typed language experience may easily forget about this subtle point. Regards, Enoch. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness. Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the Employer Resources Portal http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html _______________________________________________ Amforth-devel mailing list for http://amforth.sf.net/ Amforth-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amforth-devel
