"Michael Kalus" <mi-ka...@t-online.de> writes: > Hi Enoch. > > Here it is. I have no idea if it works with current amforth. > Some hints which amforth words have changed in versions >3.6 are > given in the srouce, there may be more since. > > I factored ,EE to copy eeprom to flash and POPEE to out it back to > eeprom - not that elegant notation. > > ; : ,ee ( -- ) > ; here , heap , edp , edp 8 do i e@ , 2 +loop ; > ; : popee ( adr n -- ) > ; 0 do dup i + i@ i 2* 2 + e! loop drop ; > ; : marker ( -- ) > ; edp >r here >r > ; ,ee create r> , r> , > ; does> >r r@ i@ r> 1+ i@ popee ; > > > Regards, Michael >
Thanks Michael, I'll be visting MARKER pretty soon. A reliable one is an absolute necessity for field code replacement. Regards, Enoch. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap2 _______________________________________________ Amforth-devel mailing list for http://amforth.sf.net/ Amforth-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amforth-devel
