-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

JHi Enoch,

> 
> This reminds me that those on architectures with 256 I/O space
> would be better off using their own "bitnames" implementation for
> flash code saving.

A classical dilemma for a general purpose library. There *will* be
always someone who complains ;)

> Even nicer would be to have just one version to include and deal
> with the differences via compile time code manipulation (but we
> don't have working [if] [else] [then] yet).

I'm 51:49 to favour the amforth shell over the controller itself to
implement this. Otherwise the code space advantage by using an optimized
library will soon be gone, I'm afraid....

Matthias

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlJ6rdUACgkQ9bEHdGEMFjPCDACgiPL/pDAnDlfMVB6LnotiFSJr
9ycAoKZl1BdEsfxQaiu1FPnLfz67Pwl0
=eqYQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers
Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore
techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most 
from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Amforth-devel mailing list for http://amforth.sf.net/
Amforth-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amforth-devel

Reply via email to