If we're talking about ranking systems, here are 2 that I use in my
trading.

My QFit ranking system does a regression fit to a quadratic equation,
then takes the first derivative of the resulting equation (the slope)
which is normalized to price of 100 (more or less).

Here is the top and bottom of a list of about 25 domestic sector ETFs
that I like.  My trading rules are that I hold funds with a rank > 3.0

Ticker          QFit    
OIH             8.245   Top of list
IGE             7.607   
XLE             6.306   
XLB             3.385   
XLI             0.292
.
.
BBH             -4.415  
XLU             -5.920  
XLV             -6.510  
RWR             -9.708  Bottom of list

I have another ranking system that ranks stocks on the SMOOTHNESS of
their advance.  Here is a recent run of Shape Filter which selects for
stocks that are under steady accumulation.  It uses curve fitting
technology like QFilt - but different.

Ticker  SFilt
AL      98.30  
EXBD    98.30
WEBM    98.10
AW      98.00
HOC     98.00
CSX     97.70
.
.
  
Reef-Break

I also have a 
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "Fred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Am I missing something ? ... Isn't this standard stuff ? i.e. 
> 
> ... some condition that makes some security eligible to be bought on 
> some bar ...
> 
> ROCx = ROC(C, 10);
> 
> PositionScore = IIf(ROCx > 0, ROCx, 0);
> PositionSize = -100;
> 
> ... followed by some condition that triggers buy / sell
> 
> Buy  = Cross(EMA(C, 13), EMA(C, 21));
> Sell = Cross(EMA(C, 21), EMA(C, 13));
> 
> The above will buy the security with the highet 10 bar ROC on the bar 
> where it meets the EMA X/O criteria and will hold it until the Sell 
> unloads it.  The system will remain flat until the next Buy Signal 
> occurs.  If one wanted to potentially hold more than one position at 
> a time then one would alter PositionSize accordingly.
> 
> Whether the first condition is directly calculatable like an ROC is 
> or is the result of reading something like Zack's list really 
> wouldn't make much difference.
> 
> These are the basic components of PositionScoring and Buy/Sell 
> signals ... aren't they ?
> 
> --- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "dingo" <dingo@> wrote:
> >
> > Ok how about an example of what you were talking about?
> >  
> > d
> > 
> > 
> >   _____  
> > 
> > From: amibroker@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> On Behalf
> > Of Fred
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 4:52 PM
> > To: amibroker@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [amibroker] Re: System Performances
> > 
> > 
> > Seriously ? ... A rotational system is different in scope then what 
> > I thought was being discussed here which appears to be a rotating 
> > universe of tradables that have some life and get traded intraday 
> > based on them meeting some form of buy & sell rules.
> > 
> > --- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "dingo" <dingo@> wrote:
> > >
> > > How about an example of how to do that using a sharpe ratio of 
> > each security
> > > and maybe trade on a rotational basis every month?  
> > >  
> > > Seriously.
> > >  
> > > d
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   _____  
> > > 
> > > From: amibroker@yahoogroups.com 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > On Behalf
> > > Of Fred
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 1:37 PM
> > > To: amibroker@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: [amibroker] Re: System Performances
> > > 
> > > 
> > > If the list is a result of some analysis you do then you can 
> > assign 
> > > a PositionScore to each security for each bar.  This would yield 
> a 
> > > constantly changing and potentially prioritized list of available 
> > > securities to be traded.
> > > 
> > > --- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "Ed Hoopes" <reefbreak_sd@> 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > As I mentioned in the first post - I have been trading this 
> > system 
> > > for
> > > > about 1.5 years.  The first quarter of this year had no severe
> > > > declines in the market, so the Max DD looks better than it 
> > really 
> > > is.
> > > >  Typically the system goes to 100% cash after about a 5% 
> > drawdown. 
> > > > 
> > > > There is another major component in my trading system that I 
> > didn't
> > > > mention - that of market timing.  I use stock index futures 
> (ES, 
> > > YM,
> > > > ER2, NQ) to hedge based on 6 indicators.  This hedging, while 
> not
> > > > perfect, reduces the drawdown considerably so the system plus 
> > > hedging
> > > > results in about 4% drawdowns.
> > > > 
> > > > On the subject of drawdowns, there has not been a >10% market
> > > > correction in over three years.  Since I have only traded this 
> > > system
> > > > for 1.5 years, I don't know what will happen when we eventually 
> > get
> > > > one of these more typical market declines.  
> > > > 
> > > > The main reason for not posting a longer trading history is 
> that 
> > > the
> > > > stock list is updated every couple of weeks, which actually 
> > > improves
> > > > results.  I used the list that was current as of Dec 31, 2005 
> > for 
> > > this
> > > > test.  I don't know how to simulate a constantly changing list 
> of
> > > > stocks in the backtester. 
> > > > 
> > > > Reef-Break 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "Phsst" <phsst@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Fred's point is accurate IMO....
> > > > > 
> > > > > If the Trader has spent blood, sweat and tears over a period 
> > of 
> > > years
> > > > > building up a serious trading equity, then a 28% System 
> > Drawdown 
> > > would
> > > > > be demoralizing (only after causing a serious case of "Butt 
> > > Pucker").
> > > > > 
> > > > > A subsequent post from Ed showed a 'Max Sys DD = -3.6%', but 
> > only
> > > > > included 48 trades... which because of the small number of 
> > trades
> > > > > seemed to me to be statistically irrelevant.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > --- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "Fred" <ftonetti@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > A Comment and a suggestion ... 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > - DrawDowns ... I could be wrong but I suspect most people 
> > > can't 
> > > > > > tolerate 28% DD's ... To bring that number down to the 
> point 
> > > where 
> > > > > > at least some people would be comfortable with it using 
> real 
> > > money 
> > > > > > one would I think have to cut it half.  Doing that with an 
> > > existing 
> > > > > > system by restricting how invested one is will result in 
> the 
> > > CAR 
> > > > > > being reduced to the square root of its original number.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > - Objective Testing ... Take your data, cut in half ... 
> > > Optimize 
> > > > > > your system over half of the data and then test the 
> > parameter 
> > > values 
> > > > > > on the other half.  This rudimentary view of out of sample 
> > > testing 
> > > > > > will give you some idea of what you are likely to 
> experience 
> > > in real 
> > > > > > trading as opposed to totally in sample results.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > --- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "intermilan04" 
> > > <intermilan04@> 
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Since I have optimized my system between 1996-2006, I 
> > guess 
> > > the 
> > > > > > > answer would be the same time period.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > --- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "Fred" <ftonetti@> 
> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > That doesn't answer my question ...
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > In the development of the system what range of data ( 
> > time 
> > > > > > period ) 
> > > > > > > > did you use ?  The same time period ? An earlier one ?
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > --- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "intermilan04" 
> > > <intermilan04@> 
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The numbers are the result of backtesting my system 
> > with
> > > > > > > > > NASDAQ and NYSE tickers (around 7000 tickers) between
> > > > > > > > > 1996/1/1~2006/1/1.
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > --- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "Fred" <ftonetti@> 
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Are the numbers you posted in sample or out of 
> > sample ?
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > --- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "intermilan04" 
> > > > > > <intermilan04@> 
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I know it depends on what you want personally for 
> > > > > > risk/reward, 
> > > > > > > > but 
> > > > > > > > > > I'm
> > > > > > > > > > > curious as to what other people's systems 
> > (developed 
> > > in 
> > > > > > > > Amibroker) 
> > > > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > > performing like. You don't have to share your 
> code 
> > > or the 
> > > > > > idea 
> > > > > > > > behind
> > > > > > > > > > > your system (unless you want to), but I'm curious.
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > Over the last 10 years, say, what is your annual 
> > > profit %, 
> > > > > > max
> > > > > > > > > > > drawdown, % winning trades, etc.?
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > I have a long system that has returned around 
> 110% 
> > > since 
> > > > > > > > 1996.  Its
> > > > > > > > > > > winning % is 47%, and the system drawdown is 
> 28%.  
> > > It is a
> > > > > > > > > > > reversal-based, swing-daytrade system.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
> > > 
> > > To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to 
> > > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> > > 
> > > For other support material please check also:
> > > http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > SPONSORED LINKS 
> > > Investment
> > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
> > t=ms&k=Investment+management+software&w1=Inves
> > > 
> > 
> tment+management+software&w2=Real+estate+investment+software&w3=Inves
> > tment+p
> > > 
> > 
> roperty+software&w4=Software+support&w5=Real+estate+investment+analys
> > is+soft
> > > ware&w6=Investment+software&c=6&s=200&.sig=_XXUzbE9l5lGlZNcMu4KNQ>
> > > management software       Real
> > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
> > t=ms&k=Real+estate+investment+software&w1=Inve
> > > 
> > 
> stment+management+software&w2=Real+estate+investment+software&w3=Inve
> > stment+
> > > 
> > 
> property+software&w4=Software+support&w5=Real+estate+investment+analy
> > sis+sof
> > > 
> > tware&w6=Investment+software&c=6&s=200&.sig=5_sgDczz3ArKGMtJ9tFSJA> 
> > estate
> > > investment software       Investment
> > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
> > t=ms&k=Investment+property+software&w1=Investm
> > > 
> > 
> ent+management+software&w2=Real+estate+investment+software&w3=Investm
> > ent+pro
> > > 
> > 
> perty+software&w4=Software+support&w5=Real+estate+investment+analysis
> > +softwa
> > > re&w6=Investment+software&c=6&s=200&.sig=_N6zcwefgp4eg5n6oX5WZw> 
> > property
> > > software       
> > > Software
> > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
> > t=ms&k=Software+support&w1=Investment+manageme
> > > 
> > 
> nt+software&w2=Real+estate+investment+software&w3=Investment+property
> > +softwa
> > > 
> > 
> re&w4=Software+support&w5=Real+estate+investment+analysis+software&w6
> > =Invest
> > > ment+software&c=6&s=200&.sig=MJ2jP31F3n64RDZkDadU8w> 
> support       Real
> > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
> > t=ms&k=Real+estate+investment+analysis+softwar
> > > 
> > 
> e&w1=Investment+management+software&w2=Real+estate+investment+softwar
> > e&w3=In
> > > 
> > 
> vestment+property+software&w4=Software+support&w5=Real+estate+investm
> > ent+ana
> > > 
> > 
> lysis+software&w6=Investment+software&c=6&s=200&.sig=GmF8PlAJASx0wrSa
> > X5-Zlw>
> > > estate investment analysis software       Investment
> > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
> > t=ms&k=Investment+software&w1=Investment+manag
> > > 
> > 
> ement+software&w2=Real+estate+investment+software&w3=Investment+prope
> > rty+sof
> > > 
> > 
> tware&w4=Software+support&w5=Real+estate+investment+analysis+software
> > &w6=Inv
> > > estment+software&c=6&s=200&.sig=aMgGsKT4w29dMAYUzQUKzg> software 
> >       
> > > 
> > >   _____  
> > > 
> > > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >       
> > > *      Visit your group "amibroker
> > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker> " on the web.
> > >   
> > > 
> > > *      To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > >  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> subject=Unsubscribe> 
> > >   
> > > 
> > > *      Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms 
> of 
> > Service
> > > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> . 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   _____
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
> > 
> > To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to 
> > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> > 
> > For other support material please check also:
> > http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > SPONSORED LINKS 
> > Investment
> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
> t=ms&k=Investment+management+software&w1=Inves
> > 
> tment+management+software&w2=Real+estate+investment+software&w3=Invest
> ment+p
> > 
> roperty+software&w4=Software+support&w5=Real+estate+investment+analysi
> s+soft
> > ware&w6=Investment+software&c=6&s=200&.sig=_XXUzbE9l5lGlZNcMu4KNQ>
> > management software         Real
> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
> t=ms&k=Real+estate+investment+software&w1=Inve
> > 
> stment+management+software&w2=Real+estate+investment+software&w3=Inves
> tment+
> > 
> property+software&w4=Software+support&w5=Real+estate+investment+analys
> is+sof
> > tware&w6=Investment+software&c=6&s=200&.sig=5_sgDczz3ArKGMtJ9tFSJA> 
> estate
> > investment software         Investment
> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
> t=ms&k=Investment+property+software&w1=Investm
> > 
> ent+management+software&w2=Real+estate+investment+software&w3=Investme
> nt+pro
> > 
> perty+software&w4=Software+support&w5=Real+estate+investment+analysis+
> softwa
> > re&w6=Investment+software&c=6&s=200&.sig=_N6zcwefgp4eg5n6oX5WZw> 
> property
> > software    
> > Software
> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
> t=ms&k=Software+support&w1=Investment+manageme
> > 
> nt+software&w2=Real+estate+investment+software&w3=Investment+property+
> softwa
> > 
> re&w4=Software+support&w5=Real+estate+investment+analysis+software&w6=
> Invest
> > ment+software&c=6&s=200&.sig=MJ2jP31F3n64RDZkDadU8w> support        Real
> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
> t=ms&k=Real+estate+investment+analysis+softwar
> > 
> e&w1=Investment+management+software&w2=Real+estate+investment+software
> &w3=In
> > 
> vestment+property+software&w4=Software+support&w5=Real+estate+investme
> nt+ana
> > 
> lysis+software&w6=Investment+software&c=6&s=200&.sig=GmF8PlAJASx0wrSaX
> 5-Zlw>
> > estate investment analysis software         Investment
> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
> t=ms&k=Investment+software&w1=Investment+manag
> > 
> ement+software&w2=Real+estate+investment+software&w3=Investment+proper
> ty+sof
> > 
> tware&w4=Software+support&w5=Real+estate+investment+analysis+software&
> w6=Inv
> > estment+software&c=6&s=200&.sig=aMgGsKT4w29dMAYUzQUKzg> software 
>       
> > 
> >   _____  
> > 
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 
> > 
> > 
> >     
> > *    Visit your group "amibroker
> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker> " on the web.
> >   
> > 
> > *    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> >  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> >   
> > 
> > *    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of 
> Service
> > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> . 
> > 
> > 
> >   _____
> >
>






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
GFT Forex Trading Accounts As low as $250 with up to 400:1 Leverage. Free Demo.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lpv1TA/jlQNAA/U1CZAA/GHeqlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.

To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to 
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com

For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to