Batch Mode ??? The Bat in BatMan is an abbreviation for BATCH i.e. BATCH MANAGER.
In any case, as I've said ... a zillion individually named charts from BatMan can be produced at the push of a button once you've spelled out the JOB or JOB(S) in the BATCH. All that leaves is for you to collect the resulting charts into whatever doc you like ... Personally I don't care for printed anything ... Even with the above I'd prefer to organize the output into an X by Y web page which would also be simple to do. --- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "Homar Simpson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No, I was thinking more along the lines of a continuous stream of > charts or possible and X by X matrix of charts on a single page. > > Output this to a pdf file. The resulting file would be a record of > any or all charts selected, and would be easier to scan by eye than > stepping through each symbol separately. > > I don't think this would be hard to do, as the existing page preview > looks fine. All that needs to be added is a batch mode. > > --- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "Fred" <ftonetti@> wrote: > > > > By "Multiple ( or all ) charts" ... Are you referring to: > > > > - All tabs for a particular layout ? > > - The above for all symbols belonging to some WatchList ? > > - The above for every layout you have defined ? > > > > BatMan can do the heavy lifting for any of these. There are no > > printing facilities in BatMan but it can get whatever tabs you want for > > single or multiple issues from multiple layouts incorporating different > > AFL's to .png's where you can do whatever you like with them although > > in todays world I'm not entirely sure why you'd want anything printed. > > Personally I'd rather review whatever is programmatically supposed to > > show up on the screen which is what BatMan was designed to do > > automatically. > > > > --- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "Homar Simpson" <x77777x@> wrote: > > > > > > Would be nice to be able to print multiple (or all) charts to a > > > printer or pdf , and not one at a time. > > > > > > Any way to do this now? Does not look like it. > > > > > >