Hemant, I've recently been playing around with LINQ in C# 2008 Express and it is FANTASTIC for what I need that Amibroker (or any other T/A package for that matter) cannot provide.
I can pull in a year's worth (or more if I want) of tick data and other timeframe data over the same period I want into collections and then go about finding out whether the supports and resistances I'm wanting to take go in my favor first before stopping my trade out. One must analyze the individual transactions in the tick data to do this kind of thing...open/high/low/close doesn't cut it because what you're interested in looking at is the stream of transactions from your entry point and on. What I sacrifice in any speed is more than made up for by being able to easily express what I want to choose out of the data in a SQL form on the data collections. Without LINQ, all of this would have been super time-consuming to express in C# (or VB.NET 2008 if that is what someone else prefers). Technical analysis packages cater to the open/high/low/close mentality whereas, in truth, the market is a completely unstructured flow of price data. What I "get back" from using LINQ and C# in this way is that "unstructured-ness" and the true picture of what happens to my trade from the exact point of entry. --- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "hemant bhai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > AmiBroker User's List>1a. Re: I try to compile the ASCII > data plugin from ADK. From: Keith McCombs > >See: > >http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx? PostID=52748&SiteID=1&pageid=0#1157102 > > >It looks like afxwin.h only comes with VC++ V6, > > afaik MFC (the newer versions) is still supported in VC > 2008. You could try the (free) VC++ 2008 Express edition. > VC6 MFC had a lot of bugs. > > For GUI applications C++ has become dated and most > (professional) programmers on Windows have moved to .NET for > GUI work. It is so much more productive. The loss in > performance is negligible. These days hard core c++ work for > Windows is mostly done in g++ or vc++ using "make". >
