Hi
I am interested in this function also, but on inspection found a few things
that I believe are errors. When I applied it to a test data set it missed a few
valid highs and lows.
Looking at the code I saw that when testing for a swing High it (correctly)
tests whether this is > End_Val_HL*WavePcnt.
However when testing for a swing Low it simply replaces the > sign with a <
sign, whereas the test should be < End_Val_HL/WavePcnt.
There are also a few peculiar issues, like using Ref(H,0) where simply H would
do, and setting a for loop between i=0 and i<Barcount, and then later testing
whether i>0 and i<Barcount, where the condition could not occur anyway if i =
0. However, these don't affect the answer.
I am working on another version (hopefully correct!) and will post this when
complete.
Brian
--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, Thomas Ludwig <thomas.lud...@...> wrote:
>
> Thanks for sharing this code. It's seems not quite identical with the
> built-in
> function, though.
>
> Regards
>
> Thomas
>
> On 19.06.2009, 20:37:04 Herman wrote:
> > I think this was posted by Dave, a long time ago:
> >
> > function ZigZagHL(prcnt)
> > {
>
> [snip]
>
