Yes, but if the formula is applied on a higher TF chart, then the 1-tick resolution is lost, is it not?
The reason I commented re: LIB/IOG, is that I know it allows the user to have (up to) 1-tick resolution accurate entries/exits displayed on an HTF chart, with a match between realtime and historical (excepting subsequent data corrections). I may be mis-understanding, but I don't think this is accomplished in AB by what you are suggesting, because once you put the formula on an HTF chart, it no longer accesses LTF (e.g. 1-tick) data historically. Please correct me if necessary, as it is possible I have a fundamental misconception about formula access to data resolutions other than chart display resolution. --- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "Tomasz Janeczko" <gro...@...> wrote: > > As for visualisation - you can apply the same formula you are using on > backtest > on tick interval - on any higher interval when charting - > timeframe function will give you same results regardless of the chart interval > exactly the same "convenience". > > Best regards, > Tomasz Janeczko > amibroker.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "progster01" <progs...@...> > To: <amibroker@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 9:08 AM > Subject: [amibroker] Re: One chart instead of several ones. > > > > That's a great approach for a backtest. Thanks for mentioning it here! > > > > The accuracy should be the same in each case, if 1-tick data is used as the > > high-resolution reference in each case. > > > > However, there is is difference in ease-of-visualization on the higher > > timeframe (HTF). > > > > I interpret Herman's comment about seeing past signals on the RT chart as > > pertaining to, say, a 1m, 5m or 15m chart, rather than a > > tick or second chart. > > > > As a simple example, suppose an MA3 and an MA10, both on 5m TF, cross > > _during_ the current bar (with calculation based on the > > transient Last price). One might prefer to observe this trade on the 5m > > chart, either in real time or historically, rather than > > on a tick chart. > > > > An LIB/IOG implementation accomplishes the asked-about goal of "past > > signals on the RT chart" (any RT chart) reflecting the > > "actual trades made". This is "automatic" regardless of the timeframe of > > the chart, which is very convenient. > > > > From a test-results-only point-of-view, LIB/IOG does not accomplish > > anything not available in AB. > > > > > > --- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "Tomasz Janeczko" <groups@> wrote: > >> > >> The same can be achieved (with GREATER accurracy), > >> by just using TICK data or one second data. Use TimeFrame functions to > >> generate > >> signals in ANY interval and run backtest on tick/1-second data. > >> You get 100% accurracy, reports are generated EXACTLY > >> (with millisecond resolution) and you get everything better > >> than on "other platforms". > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Tomasz Janeczko > >> amibroker.com > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "progster01" <progster@> > >> To: <amibroker@yahoogroups.com> > >> Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 6:38 PM > >> Subject: [amibroker] Re: One chart instead of several ones. > >> > >> > >> > >well, it would be nice in live trading if past signals on the RT chart > >> > reflected actual trades made. If conditions at the last developing bar > >> > are not the same as all historical bars then this will not be the case. > >> > > >> > The platform features that are involved in representing evolving bar > >> > conditions during a backtest are commonly known as: > >> > > >> > 1. Look-Inside-Bar (LIB) > >> > 2. Intrabar Order Generation (IOG) > >> > > >> > These features are available on some other platforms, and they are quite > >> > nice to have. > >> > > >> > One caveat though is that you have to have available the higher > >> > resolution data in your Cache for the feature to work. IOW, you can't > >> > look-inside 5m bars to the tick level unless you have tick data. No > >> > surprise there. > >> > > >> > Also, backtests with LIB/IOG are _much_ slower, by a factor of > >> > approximately the ratio of base-bar to inside-bar data resolution. > >> > > >> > Nevertheless, where accuracy is a concern, these are great feature to > >> > have available. > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > **** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ **** > > This group is for the discussion between users only. > > This is *NOT* technical support channel. > > > > TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to > > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com > > > > TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at > > http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/ > > (submissions sent via other channels won't be considered) > > > > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG: > > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/ > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >