Great link. Thanks for the post.

Mike

--- In [email protected], "tuzo_wilson" <j.tuzo.wil...@...> wrote:
>
> If anyone is interested in a technical article around windows memory, Mark 
> Russinovich has a great blog post called Pushing the Limits of Windows: 
> Virtual Memory at 
> http://blogs.technet.com/markrussinovich/archive/2008/11/17/3155406.aspx 
> where he covers topics such as virtual memory, private bytes, committed 
> memory, etc.  
> 
> 
> Tuzo
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Tomasz Janeczko" <groups@> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> > 
> > Windows Task Manager you say.
> > Do you know that WTM can display dozen of different "memory usage" figures
> > and most of them are misleading?
> > Windows works with Virtual memory. RAM is NOT allocated to process. Virtual 
> > memory is.
> > Then, on the fly, virtual memory pages are mapped to RAM and used, but one 
> > second later
> > the same RAM cells can be (re)used by different process and different 
> > virtual memory address.
> > 
> > So called "mem usage" in WTM is not total memory usage, but working set 
> > size.
> > http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc938567.aspx
> > 
> > Total memory usage is shown as "private bytes" (aka "virtual memory size").
> > 
> > Also if you run 32 bit OS, it will allow only 2GB to be used for apps, 
> > regardless how much RAM you have
> > (or 3GB with /LARGEADDRESSAWARE and /3G boot ini switch)
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Tomasz Janeczko
> > amibroker.com
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "reefbreak_sd" <reefbreak_sd@>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 6:58 AM
> > Subject: [amibroker] Re: How much ram is being used.
> > 
> > 
> > > The details are different on various Windows versions, but press 
> > > CTRL+ALT+DELETE and you will get windows task manager.  Click on 
> > > the  Performance dropdown and you can see your memory usage as you run 
> > > and exit various programs.
> > >
> > > Just for Example:
> > > I run Win Vista (hate it !) with 4gbytes of RAM.  I run AB in real time 
> > > mode with data from IQ Feed.  One processor runs AB and 
> > > the other processor runs IQ Feed data manager.  Both CPU's are busy about 
> > > 50% of the time and I'm using just over 2gbytes or RAM. 
> > > There is no page file activity on the disk.
> > >
> > > ReefBreak
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], "jmdeacon" <jmdeacon@> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I am considering buying a new computer and was wondering if there was a 
> > >> way to figure out how much Ram I am using.  I am not a 
> > >> programmer by profession and have self taught myself a fair amount, but 
> > >> sometimes my assumptions about computers etc are just 
> > >> plain wrong, so let me no if my thinking is correct.
> > >>
> > >> I noticed when I run an optimization, the first pass will take about 3 
> > >> minutes and then each subsequent step takes about 1 
> > >> minute.  I noticed a while ago that when I installed more ram, the first 
> > >> step time did not change as much as the additional step 
> > >> times.  I am assuming that the amount of ram is part of this.  If the 
> > >> amount of ram is more than the amount of data loaded in to 
> > >> be tested, then I will minimize the time for each additional step after 
> > >> the first pass.
> > >>
> > >> If I am correct of this, is there a way to find out how much ram that 
> > >> threshold is on my system?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >>
> > >> John
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------
> > >
> > > **** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
> > > This group is for the discussion between users only.
> > > This is *NOT* technical support channel.
> > >
> > > TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
> > > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> > >
> > > TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
> > > http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
> > > (submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
> > >
> > > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> > > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to