I agree with the sentiments of Grant Noble & Steve Hite also 2009/11/24 Keith McCombs <[email protected]>
> > > Ronald -- > Sorry, but I agree with the quote below, which you attribute to Grant > Noble and Steve Hite. > > Also, I doubt that the AB community represents a very good market for > "Black Box" software. > > You might better translate your indicators into TradeStation's > EasyLanguage. EL code can be easily encrypted and, I believe, the TS > community is more receptive to "Black Boxs". > -- Keith > > Ronald Davis wrote: > > > I have no C++ programming skills at all, so making an AFL plugin is out > of the question for me. > Also, I imagine it would be a lot of work for C++ programmers to create > Plugins because of > the inability of DLLS to access the fantastic array processing that is > unique to Amibroker. > > I have attached a chart of UKW which, IMHO, clearly shows top pivots and > the bottom pivots. > > Years ago,when my son showed me the Amibroker software, > I concluded that it should be possible to develop AFL smoothing techniques > that would > produce custom indicator lines that would display the technical status of > any symbol. > > Hopefully, some Amibroker readers of this Yahoogroup agree with my view > that these chart lines > really do a good job of showing the top pivots and the bottom pivots. > > This email is a suggestion that we form an Amibroker/Saul Alinsky community > organizer group in > an attempt to convince T J to include Encryption Ability WITHIN the AFL > editor. > IMHO, T J'S comment per 2) below that he would make it a seperate add on > was to allay the > concerns of grantnoble and stevehite per 1) below. > > 1) On April 13, and April 14, grantnoble and stevehite submitted the below > descenting comments. > > "I hope this functionality is never implemented. > If one's AFL is that good then just keep it to yourself and make a private > fortune or write a plugin in C/C++ > and sell that (if you can). Tomasz has a great open community in the Yahoo > group and this doesn't promote > a sharing of ideas. I don't see how this benefits anyone other than third > parties who are just looking to make > a quick buck." > > 2) On Apr 25th, 2006, Tomasz Janeczko responded with "This will be made > available as a separate add-on > product" > > I have also attached a wordpad of the all of the Encryption feedbacks that > were posted in response to > Encryption suggestion #51. Ron D > > >
