My, aren't we touchy. Actually, I was more interested in telling you that
your message had a virus attached to it than giving you a hard time about
your technician license. Maybe now that it looks like CW will be dropped
from amateur requirements, we'll see more of you guys down on the bands
where AM is still practiced.
Bob W6TR
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick Jankowiak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <amradio@mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 8:20 PM
Subject: [AMRadio] Re: KD5OEI
Hey Geoff, I didn't take anything the wrong way, or from Bob's post with
the good buddy either (although I did feel compelled to reply to that
one!). No skin off my nose, all is good.
I gotta fix up them rigs.. soon soon.. at least they are un-buried.
PJ
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 18:24:04 -0500
From: Geoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [AMRadio] KD5OEI
To: Discussion of AM Radio <amradio@mailman.qth.net>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
It's come to my attention that I may have shed some negative light on a
fellow enthusiast, Patrick Jankowiak/KD5OEI.
______________________________________________________________
AMRadio mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
