I may have an Air Force tech manual on the 96D if you don't have one. I worked on these transmitters while with the Air Force in England.

Dave, W3ST
Publisher of the Collins Journal
Secretary to the Collins Radio Association
www.collinsra.com - the CRA Website
Now with PayPal
CRA Nets: 3805 Khz every Monday at 8 PM EST
and 14255 every Saturday at 12 Noon EST
----- Original Message ----- From: "James M. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Discussion of AM Radio" <amradio@mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 12:44 AM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Wicox 96D TX


Ola John,
Yes, by all means, if you can restore it, (to original maybe)!
The things covered 160 to 10 meters, if you got all the RF decks with it.
It did AM as well as cw, the HV power supply for each cabinet was quite handy.
Having said all that, and reading what you have so far, I would say if you
are just going to put it on the air, you have most of the makings right now.
The modulator section is indeed missing, but I bet you can find someone
that has the pieces you would need. They are prevalent in the land to the north Canada. Loads of them were used/assigned to duty there. I think I have some photos of the system, I will send them to you directly so you can see what the system looked like in "full crye", quite the beautiful rig. Some of the HV supplies ran
on three phase but some were also single phase, those are the easy ones
to get going.

A real nice rig, worth the effort, I think.
YMMV
Jim
WB2FCN

----- Original Message ----- From: "John Lyles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <amradio@mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 12:21 AM
Subject: [AMRadio] Wicox 96D TX


I picked up this thing yesterday at a SK's wood shed for $50. It had been sitting next to the ugly-painted BC610E, which recently went on EPAY.

The Wilcox 96D is < a foot wide, 6 feet tall, 300+ lb box. It "works in a drawer", in that it can be slid out on rails, for inspection inside. It was built in November of 1952. It has an RF exciter, crystal socket inside, and an 807 driving an 813 driving a PAIR of 450TLs. Only the 807 remained in the socket. Plate voltage on the final was 4100 and current was 0.6 - 0.9 Amps. It was a powerful transmitter in its day! The power supply was separate, and it isn't certain it made AM or not. Frequency range is ~ 2 - 12 MHz according to the dials. It has little doors which open to expose the turns counters for tuning, and one opens to get to the fuses and power relays. On top are a pair of balanced output studs. This funky looking transmitter (slim) needs the final plate tuning cap, but has most else. It is loaded with some good parts, including the turns counter dials, two big slip stator caps, a can within a can neaturalizing cap. The PA inductor is tapped at numerous points, an
d has a
second coil which can be slid into and out of the fixed inductor.

Now the dilema. Its certainly a different rig, but it needs to be tubed with pair of paralleled 450TLs and needs the cap along with a few small parts. Should I part it out, for something homebrew, like a balanced antenna Tuner? Or try and restore 'er? I'd be curious about others experience and opinions. BTW, I have three other transmitter projects needing my attention right now. I got the Wilcox out of the truck bed and plopped it out under a roof next to my shed this afternoon. Inside one of the front doors there is a complete parts list and schematic!

73
John
K5PRO
New Mexico
______________________________________________________________
AMRadio mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
AMfone Website: http://www.amfone.net
AM List Admin: Brian Sherrod/w5ami, Paul Courson/wa3vjb





______________________________________________________________
AMRadio mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
AMfone Website: http://www.amfone.net
AM List Admin: Brian Sherrod/w5ami, Paul Courson/wa3vjb

Reply via email to