Me too!

73,  Jack, W9GT

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: "ne1s" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

> My votes: 
> 
> I vote for letting the "reply" button send to the originator of the 
> message only. 
> 
> Set the "reply all" button to send to the list. 
> 
> -Larry/NE1S 
> ______________________________________________________________ 
From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Mon Jun 12 12:04:44 2006
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Original-To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Delivered-To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Received: from mail2.panix.com (mail2.panix.com [166.84.1.73])
        by mailman.qth.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81D3D859D0D
        for <amradio@mailman.qth.net>; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 12:04:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from panix3.panix.com (panix3.panix.com [166.84.1.3])
        by mail2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A9749D8A1
        for <amradio@mailman.qth.net>; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:58:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by panix3.panix.com (8.11.6p3/8.8.8/PanixN1.1) with ESMTP id
        k5CFwLC16737
        for <amradio@mailman.qth.net>; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:58:21 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:58:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: John Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Subject: [AMRadio] Mail Client differences
X-BeenThere: amradio@mailman.qth.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of AM Radio <amradio.mailman.qth.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio>,
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/private/amradio>
List-Post: <mailto:amradio@mailman.qth.net>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio>,
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 16:04:44 -0000



   Although certainly a minority, there are those who do not use OutHouse 
Mail or it's clones and/or analogs.  So please don't expect *everyone* to 
have nice "Reply To" and "Reply To All" keys like you might.

   Speaking strictly for me, I use good ol' Pine under a Unix shell 
account, thus I'm constrained to reading text in ASCII mode, and I can see 
whatever a VT100 would have been capable of displaying, and thus it's user 
interface, as well.  I have one 'reply' button: the 'R' key. So I 
regularly edit the TO: fields, and snip the excess text when replying to 
traffic on this List.

   Also, I must separately save and download via FTP, any attachments for 
viewing by more modern programs - Pine don't know from .jpgs or .pdfs.

   "Cromagnon Computing.." you might think.  It's the same as when that 
Russian Colonel flew his Mig into Heathrow and defected. We all sneered at 
the use of extensive vacuum tubes in a 'modern' fighter plane, until the 
Russians said "Da, is old technology, very certain. But, after nuclear 
blast and EMP - whose planes do you think will still be flyable?"  That 
shut a bunch of guys up...  ;}

   So my ancient email client is uttery immune to any virus or spyware, 
because it's 7-bit, has no OutHouse Contact List, no Micro$hit Address 
List...   That's why I like it, Old Skool and all..


   ObAmRadio: In the middle of a nice QSO Saturday evening, my beloved old 
Valiant woofed up something in it's tank circuit and died.  I assume one 
of the new capacitors in the 160/80 portion has failed - the other bands 
tune and load as normal. So - another trip to the bench for the Old 
Girl...  the Joys and Tears of Boatanchor Hamdom.  ;}


Cheers

John  KB6SCO
Carson City  DM09fg
Valiant / Ranger / Elmac AF-67
R390 / R390A / R388


Reply via email to