Eddy I would like to see how you laid out the 135 degree phased inverted L array. Please explain off line if you wish.

73  Jim
W5JO



Hi Chuck,

Many thanks for the FB note, & good words...

Yes indeed, I'm still keeping the good folks at the Kester Solder Co. working two shifts! Hi Hi. I'm presently collecting what I'll need for a HB 4PR-1000A kilowatt linear amplifier dedicated to 160-meters, to complement my 3-element(!) 135-degree phased inerted "L" array for 1.8-MHz>
~73!~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ




----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <amradio@mailman.qth.net>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 7:37 AM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] ARRL changes: League dumps threat to AM


Well said Eddy..............

Far too many in the USA are oblivious to the fact that Government (local, state and federal) and the politically correct mouth-breathers who support their actions are slowly consuming our freedoms and regulating everything to death. Ham radio is right in that mix.

BTW, are you still building those stunning rigs?

73 de W4MIL
Chuck



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; amradio@mailman.qth.net
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 9:10 AM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] ARRL changes: League dumps threat to AM

What the heck is going on with our neighbours south of the 49th
Parallel...?!

You've seemingly got a licensing body populated by little-more than did-interested, beaurocratic, career-oriented mandarins, headed-up by politically correct toadies of big money & big bu$ine$$...your largest
lobby
group seems to be grossly ineffective of late in its ability to grab
the ear
of the FCC to make it listen, because it's apparently too distracted by
its
own agenda & internal empire building...

I am NOT attempting to condemn you good folks, or put you down, or set
up
our system here in Canada by comparison as some sort of a ",,,beacon of enlightenment" --- nothing like that at all! But man-o-man, I do feel
for
you guys.

It's like you're all alone in a cruel world that simply continues to
change
for the worst. Obviously politics & Ham radio do NOT mix...on ANY
level. I
only hope things might change for you guys soon, because you certainly
do
deserve better than what you've been getting for the past several years,
IMHO...

~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ



----- Original Message -----
From: "Bry Carling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service"
<amradio@mailman.qth.net>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 6:51 AM
Subject: [AMRadio] ARRL changes: League dumps threat to AM


> Thanks, Paul - excellent commentary from WA3VJB...
>
> The threat to operators of old tube AM and CW rigs is
> somewhat diminished.
>
> To expand and explain slightly - the part they DO want > to keep... > They now propose to destroy only ten meters, perhaps > figuring > that since there has been a long sunspot minimum, no > one
> will be paying attention...
>
> http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2007/03/23/101/?nc=1
>
> Wa3VJB wrote
>
> > The ARRL, a small, non-profit publishing company in
> > Newington Connecticut, has abandoned a threat to
> > impose a system of bandwidth segregation on the
> > various modes and activities on HF below 10 meters.
> >
> > In an email to the club's volunteer administrators,
> > Dave Sumner, the company's highest-paid, unelected
> > staffer, seems to have acknowledged the overwhelming
> > opposition arrayed against his group's plan the past
> > several years.
> >
> > The threat to AM was specific and unquestionable -- > > it
> > would have imposed the first-ever, numerical
> > constraints on bandwidth without providing a means > > for
> > licensees to ensure compliance and ward off
> > unwarranted complaints from those who do not
> > participate in this mode and activity.
> >
> > The scheme would also have characterized AM as a
> > "footnote" that otherwise would not be in compliance
> > with their misguided system of bandwidth segregation.
> >
> > Sumner wrote, in part,
> >
> > Quote
> > Regulation by bandwidth rather than by mode of
> > emission remains controversial below 28 MHz because > > of
> > perceived potential impact on established operating
> > patterns, so these proposals were removed from the
> > list with one narrow exception.
> >
> > Those who subscribe to the ARRL can pursue the full
> > text, which contains several insults and additional
> > patronizing language to those of us who dared to
> > question the scheme their group tried to slip > > through.
> >
> > Keywords:
> > --And for the truly paranoid
> > --don't know all the facts
> > --making their complaints and threats
> > --have other motives
> >
> > It is important to note that the club continues to > > try > > to sneak through the small, remaining portion of > > their
> > scheme that opponents had not, until now, chosen to
> > challenge.
> >
> > Fresh opposition remarks about the fraction the > > League
> > continues to push are now being filed and accepted on
> > the FCC's Electronic Comment Filing System.
> >
> > The latest challenges join the carefully considered,
> > well-reasoned arguments that gave the ARRL a severe
> > spanking and refuted that group's earlier threat to > > AM
> > that they now have abandoned.
> >
> > This appears to be the system of feedback the group > > in
> > Newington prefers.
> >
> > Paul/VJB
> >
> >
> >
> >
_________________________________________________________________________
___
________
> > Never miss an email again!
> > Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail > > arrives.
> > http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > AMRadio mailing list
> > List Rules (must read!): > > http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > > List Home: > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> > Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
> > To unsubscribe, send an email to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
> > the word unsubscribe in the message body.
> >
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> AMRadio mailing list
> List Rules (must read!): > http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > List Home: > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
> To unsubscribe, send an email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> the word unsubscribe in the message body.

______________________________________________________________
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


________________________________________________________________________
AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free
from AOL at AOL.com.
______________________________________________________________
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

______________________________________________________________
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.




______________________________________________________________
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

Reply via email to