My thanks to the AO-51 control team for this week's schedule, which includes 
activation of 145.880/435.150 for QRP operation. There is another week of this 
"QRP Pair" coming up later in the month. I hope more of you will take the time 
to see just how little power it takes for effective communication on AO-51 or 
any of the FM satellites, for that matter.

On the AO-51 pass here from roughly 22:30 UTC to 22:45 UTC, KD8CAO and I 
completed a contact using HTs with whip antennas. Doug was using a Pryme RD-98, 
and I was using the Diamond SRH-789 telescoping whip. Anyone who has an HT with 
a general coverage receiver ought to check out the Diamond whip because it 
brings the shortwave broadcast bands alive on the radios from Yaesu (VX-3R and 
VX-7R) and Kenwood (TH-F6A) I've tried it with. In addition, it works extremely 
well on the satellites. I didn't pick up the RD-98 for satellite use, but it is 
comparable in performance to Pryme's satellite-popular AL-800 telescoping whip. 
Pryme, by the way, claims the same gain numbers for the RD-98 as for the 
AL-800. I had an AL-800, and my RD-98 performs at least as well as it did. I 
prefer the SRH-789, which has an SMA connector, because of its versatility - 
and it's more rigid than the RD-98 in use. Diamond also makes a BNC version of 
the antenna, the RH-789.

On the next pass of AO-51, which hits me beginning at about 00:10 UTC, I'll be 
back on the crappy ol' Elk dual-band log periodic - but I'll be running 50 
milliwatts out instead of the 5 watts I just used with the whip. I intend to 
run 50 mW and the Elk for the remainder of the weekend on AO-51. Experience 
suggests that I need at least 8 degrees of elevation to make the satellite on 
.05-watt, but I almost made it through the other day when AO-51 was below 7 
degrees. A good contact at that low angle will represent a new "miles per watt" 
record for me, and I hope to get there.

Thanks again to the control team for the QRP-pair activation. 

73 to all,

Tim - N3TL
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

Reply via email to