Clint, What do you have against the anritsu equipment I used to counter the 2.65dB claim? I found UHF to be about a half dB and VHF to be better than that and when I checked the calibration it was within a tenth of a dB.
Charles Clint Bradford wrote: > >> ... from what I have read, a 2.65db loss of signal using Arrow's > crappy duplexer ... > > Unless an Arrow Antenna performance report beings with, "My Motorola > test equipment - certified within the last year - indicates ... [such- > and-such performance characteristics] ... " - this that post is > worthless to me. > > And should be worthless to anyone demanding the best-available > information. > > And such mis-information shouldn't be passed on to anyone else. And > messagegroup moderators should delete such undocumented tripe. > > Needless to say, I haven't read much of the recent "Arrow Performance" > threads. Just aren't worth my time. > > Just my opinion, of course. I have been wrong. > > I couldn't ask for - nor imagine - better performance from my Arrow > Antennas than what I am enjoying now. They prove themselves pass after > pass, demo after demo .... > > Clint Bradford > West coast curmudgeon > http://www.work-sat.com > > _______________________________________________ > Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb > > _______________________________________________ Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
