Tried ITrack, SuM, and TRAK_SM. All three agreed perfectly, 2-3 figures past the decimal point.
Tried the MOON.TXT keps. WISP choked on them. SATPC32 accepted them, but the azimuth was about 4 degrees different, and the elevation off by about 15 degrees. Since SuM is correct, it looks like the pseudokeps are only close. Alan WA4SCA -----Original Message----- From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On Behalf Of Larry Gerhardstein Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2010 3:46 PM To: AMSAT BB Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: moon.txt I just tested the keps below from moon.txt. SatPC accepts them ok, but unfortunately here in Plains, Montana right now we have 100% overcast so I can not sight the moon. Larry W7IN On 4/11/2010 2:30 PM, Larry Gerhardstein wrote: > moon.text file: > > MOON > 1 00000U 00000A 10019.90529622 .00000000 00000-0 00000-0 0 0004 > 2 00000 25.1631 348.5977 0637000 142.8591 221.8486 00.036600996 6 > > Posters of this information include Colin Hurst, Louis House KD5GM, Dale Hershberger, and mlengrus...@aol.com (who possibly is the source). This was posted on 2/17/2010. > > Larry W7IN > > > _______________________________________________ > Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb > > _______________________________________________ Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb _______________________________________________ Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
