Shouldn't is show as a Satellite contact under the propagation Mode? I don't think it is band specific is it for VUCC.
Joe KI4TZ Ted wrote: > Well, Patrick, I don't have an answer for your question, but the question > brings up another old issue. My brand new LoTW VUCC account shows 11 sat > contacts and 2 440mhz contacts (sat contacts). So, some are uploading sat > contacts as 440 contacts and some as 2m contacts. Same issue on eQSL. I had > this debate with someone here awhile back. It seems to me that the consensus > is that we log an FM sat contact as a 440 contact. But some want to log as a > 2m contact since the tx was on 2m. > > We better have some conformity on this or some of the LoTW data will not > match > > I'm going to continue to use paper until I get my VUCC Satellite, but it > would save a lot of trouble in the future if we all get on the same page > > 73, K7TRK listening.... > > -----Original Message----- > From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On > Behalf Of Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK) > Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 6:38 PM > To: amsat-bb@amsat.org > Subject: [amsat-bb] XE2/WD9EWK QSOs in LOTW, and a question > > Hi! > > I just uploaded all of my XE2/WD9EWK satellite QSOs to LOTW. > Only 242 QSOs, and it took me about 20 minutes to massage my > spreadsheet log into an ADIF file suitable for LOTW. Upon > uploading my QSOs, I had 32 QSLs from 242 QSOs. Not bad at > all! I will keep at it tonight, trying to get some of my > Canadian QSOs (as VA7EWK and CJ7EWK) into LOTW this evening. > The PDF by N5JB was extremely helpful. I uploaded only the > 7 fields necessary to make an LOTW QSO entry, even though I > have a lot more data for each QSO in my spreadsheet. > > I have a question for those who have uploaded AO-16 QSOs to > LOTW. For the Mode field, do you use FM as the mode you > transmitted, SSB for the mode you received, or something else? > Just trying to make sure I get this one right, since I have > some AO-16 QSOs as CJ7EWK (and a bunch more as WD9EWK). > > Thanks in advance, and 73! > > > > > > Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK > http://www.wd9ewk.net/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb > > > _______________________________________________ > Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb > > _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
