I did close to a year ago and they said they knew about the problem, but were busy with VUCC and web re-design. It is probably a good time to remind them :-)
73, Joe kk0sd -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Yanko [mailto:wb3...@cox.net] Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 12:57 AM To: Gary "Joe" Mayfield; amsat...@wd9ewk.net; amsat-bb@amsat.org Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: restating LOTW question Has anybody contacted ARRL HQ to let them know SO-67 is out of the loop? I'm certain they can investigate and correct this. If not, then a suitable explanation would be required. 73, Jeff WB3JFS ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gary "Joe" Mayfield" <gary_mayfi...@hotmail.com> To: <amsat...@wd9ewk.net>; <amsat-bb@amsat.org> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 8:38 PM Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: restating LOTW question > Patrick, > > If your approach is wrong that makes two of us :-) Last I checked no > SO-67 -- I have no idea why! > 73, > Joe kk0sd > > -----Original Message----- > From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On > Behalf Of Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK) > Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 10:21 PM > To: amsat-bb@amsat.org > Subject: [amsat-bb] restating LOTW question > > Hi! > > Thanks to those who have responded to my post when I made my > first uploads to LOTW. I had asked about what "mode" I should > use when uploading AO-16 QSOs, since that is a cross-mode > satellite (that's how I worked it - FM up, SSB down). I have > heard about what to set the BAND field, and N5JB's document > makes it pretty clear that you use the band you transmit on > for that field. I am not uploading fields beyond the 7 > necessary to make a valid LOTW QSO record, so other fields > like FREQ and FREQ_RX don't matter. > > My guess is that, if I follow the way the BAND field is > handled for satellite QSOs in LOTW, I would use the mode I > transmitted with for the MODE field. In the case of AO-16, > that would be FM. N5JB's document mentions an additional > field BAND_RX that some may use. I have not seen any mention > of a "MODE_RX" field, but I will go with "MODE" as the mode > from my transmitter unless I get some authoritative information > to the contrary. > > I will proceed to uploading CJ7EWK QSOs from November 2008, > and try to get all of my July 2010 VA7EWK QSOs - including > those at the Canada/USA border - done tonight. Then the huge > task of the WD9EWK QSOs. > > By the way, is SO-67 still a no-go in LOTW? > > 73! > > > > > > Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK > http://www.wd9ewk.net/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb > > _______________________________________________ > Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb > _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
