On Aug 4, 2011, at 10:51 AM, Dee wrote:

> Yes, I have been the recipient of many requests for assistance to get
> SATPC32 functioning, however, it is never the programs fault-it is 99%
> of the time - the users inability to get their computer operating-
> Sounds like a Bill Gates problem to me.
And that may be the reason some people simply choose not to use Windows but 
other 
platforms instead which you just ignored.

> Anyway, please enjoy the fruits of many hours of people that volunteer
> behind the scenes to get satellites in orbit and functioning.  Let us
> see to it that our toys in space are funded.  Don't think Congress is
> going to give the HAMS a few million to fool around with.
> Dee, NB2F

Seriously? Maybe you should go outside, breathe in the fresh air and enjoy 
life. You're 
getting way too riled up about something that's in the larger scheme of things 
not worth it. 
What is your problem? Why do you feel you need to tell people what to do? And 
even more
why do you believe that just because they don't agree with your choice of a 
certain tool they
don't support the efforts of AMSAT? Do you track the donations by name and have 
a list?

Relax, life's too short.

73 Mike K5TRI


_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

Reply via email to