Alan, I noted that yesterday as well. 73 Colin. -----Original Message----- From: Alan Cresswell [mailto:alancressw...@xtra.co.nz] Sent: Thursday, 18 August 2011 11:16 To: 'Colin Hurst'; 'Ben Bishop'; 'AMSAT' Subject: RE: [amsat-bb] Re: ARISSat-1 telemetry top submitters
Hi Colin, Yes, the other interesting thing is that recently ARISsat has been coming out of eclipse not too long before the start of my morning passes. On those occasions I have received anything up to 19 consecutive data frames (or about 3 minutes) before I receive the first Kursk frame. 73 Alan ZL2BX -----Original Message----- From: Colin Hurst [mailto:cjhu...@bigpond.net.au] Sent: Thursday, 18 August 2011 01:21 To: 'Alan Cresswell'; 'Ben Bishop'; 'AMSAT' Subject: RE: [amsat-bb] Re: ARISSat-1 telemetry top submitters Alan, The last KURSK segment I received were 741858 on the 12th August. My educated guess is that because ARISSAT1 is resetting during every eclipse the KURSK experiment is not able to obtain the MET and use it as a file name. Hence it is defaulting to 944. 73 Colin VK5HI -----Original Message----- From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On Behalf Of Alan Cresswell Sent: Thursday, 18 August 2011 05:49 To: 'Ben Bishop'; 'AMSAT' Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ARISSat-1 telemetry top submitters Hi all, According to my logs the last Kursk frame I received on the 0405UT pass on 12 August was 720206. The first Kursk frame on the 12 August 2035UT pass was 944. The interesting thing was that it apparently treated this as a valid frame. i.e it accumulated and combined all five parts. All Kursk frames from that point onward have been treated as "exists" and ignored. 2011/08/12-20:36:44 Received Kursk frame 5 with MET=944 len=48. Do we have <C:\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.5>? 2011/08/12-20:36:44 No. Saving to <C:\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.5>. 2011/08/12-20:36:44 Checking for all five parts. 2011/08/12-20:36:44 <C:\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.1>: OK. 2011/08/12-20:36:44 <C:\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.2>: OK. 2011/08/12-20:36:44 <C:\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.3>: OK. 2011/08/12-20:36:44 <C:\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.4>: OK. 2011/08/12-20:36:44 <C:\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.5>: OK. 2011/08/12-20:36:44 Combining KURSK parts into <C:\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.EXP>. 2011/08/12-20:36:44 Done combining. 2011/08/12-20:36:44 Forwarding from ZL2BX to telemetry.arissattlm.org frame type E 2011/08/12-20:36:50 Received telemetry frame with MET=1589 Len=371 2011/08/12-20:36:50 Forwarding from ZL2BX to telemetry.arissattlm.org frame type T 2011/08/12-20:36:58 Received Kursk frame 1 with MET=944 len=516. Do we have <C:\\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.1>? 2011/08/12-20:36:58 Yes. <C:\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.1> exists. 2011/08/12-20:36:58 Forwarding from ZL2BX to telemetry.arissattlm.org frame type E 73 Alan ZL2BX -----Original Message----- From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On Behalf Of Ben Bishop Sent: Wednesday, 17 August 2011 14:36 To: AMSAT Cc: n...@lavabit.com Subject: [amsat-bb] Re:ARISSat-1 – telemetry top submitters G'day Jerry, I don't think there's anything wrong with your ARISSatTLM, as I've only been getting KURSK-944s since the 13th. My last 'proper good' experiment frame was: 2011/08/11-08:12:48 Received Kursk frame 2 with MET=650105 len=516. Satellite MET around then was: 2011/08/11-08:12:54 Received telemetry frame with MET=653412 Len=371 I missed the 12th, and on the 13th the telemetry and experiment MET had reset: 2011/08/13-04:34:16 Received telemetry frame with MET=2514 Len=371 ..... 2011/08/13-04:34:24 Received Kursk frame 3 with MET=944 len=516. Do we have <C:\Users\Ben\Desktop\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.3>? 2011/08/13-04:34:24 No. Saving to <C:\Users\Ben\Desktop\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.3>. And from that point on, I have only received KURSK-944 frames (which are still auto-forwarding). 2011/08/17-05:30:04 Received Kursk frame 5 with MET=944 len=48. Do we have <C:\Users\Ben\Desktop\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.5>? 2011/08/17-05:30:04 Yes. <C:\Users\Ben\Desktop\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.5> exists. 73, Ben VK2FBRB On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:08 PM, <n...@lavabit.com> wrote: > A question for all, for a few days now my ARISSatTLM has been reporting > the Kursk as being (I believe, I'm not at home to check right now) > something like Kursk-944.x or perhaps it was Kursk-444.x (some real low > perhaps hung up on that and needs a restart? Anyone else, what are the > latest Kursk frames that you are seeing? _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1392 / Virus Database: 1520/3840 - Release Date: 08/17/11 _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1392 / Virus Database: 1520/3841 - Release Date: 08/17/11 _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
