I stayed up all night Friday preparing printouts and stuff for the ARRL SW 
Division Convention. Left the house at 6:30am - to get there for our first of 
five sat passes at 7:47am. Worked five passes in front of folks. Performed my 
sat show for 90 minutes in front of a standing-room-only group of eighty-two. 
It was a non-stop flurry of activity. Had a GREAT time. Voice gone ... 
"convention legs" (you know, those muscles behind your shins get really sore - 
muscles that you usually never know are there ... (grin)).

Got home about 10pm. Checked email. Six messages from show attendees, thanking 
me for everything. I quickly scanned the AMSAT-BB, QRZ.com, and eHam.net - and 
found a reply to a message I had written in a thread last week that really set 
me off. Someone mentioned that ARISSat-1 was "crippled" and of no use ... I 
replied by listing its intended modes, and the fact that all is working pretty 
darned as expected. We've even taxed a battery that was only rated at 5 
discharge-charge cycles ... "But it is all working," I wrote.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Not really...it has become a piece of space junk very quickly. Deploying 
without the correct antenna and a crappy battery is an example of where our 
space program has gone. A sat that is in faliure mode only days after 
deployment. Donate more to AMSAT, we might get another piece or two of space 
junk in orbit before the ISS falls out of orbit. 

/s/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Well, I THOUGHT I was going to bed quickly. No way was I going to let that go 
unanswered overnight:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>> ... it has become a piece of space junk very quickly ...

I'll tell that to the 45 folks who witnessed/heard it this afternoon at the 
ARRL SW Division Convention in Torrance, CA. They will be so glad to be 
enlightened by your comment. They THOUGHT it was exciting hearing that 250mW 
signal and getting amped up about amateur sat comms this morning. But according 
to you, they are all wrong ...

>> ... Deploying without the correct antenna ...

Yet working marvelously - a true testament to those  who built the satellite.

>> ... and a crappy battery ...

The battery is exactly what was planned for - and anyone knowledgeable with the 
project knew its limitations. It was subjected to a very different charging 
regimen - as opposed to its expected rating of "five" discharge-charge cycles. 
If anyone calls the battery aspect of this project a "failure" then they have 
no clue as to what they are talking about. The battery was designed for Russian 
spacesuits and EVAs - seemed OK for that type of work to those who are 
responsible for the lives of their Cosmonauts.

>> ... is an example of where our space program has gone ...

Uh, this is an amateur radio project - with a Russian educational project on 
board. Where does NASA - "our space program" fail?

We deployed an experiment over a month ago that is to this hour working well. 
This was never meant to be a long-term project.

I am responsible for AMSAT receiving $1175 so far for this project. I do not 
remember seeing your name on the list of donors. Please correct me if I am 
wrong. And if you are truly interested n the future of amateur satellites, I'd 
like to see you include AMSAT in your will next week, and donate a little 
toward the future projects that are in the works. OR, of course, you can just 
moan and complain mindlessly in public forums like this one. It's your choice.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

I wasn't livid ... just irritated at the ignorance. Yes, I know that the 
battery started to deteriorate a little sooner than expected. But no one had 
subjected such a battery to what ARISSat-1 engineers were doing to it: MANY 
shallow charges daily. Just couple the YIN of excitedly working ARISSat-1 in 
front of a live audience and hearing people applaud the project - versus the 
YANG of this moronic post ... It was quite a day.

And so it goes ...

Clint Bradford, K6LCS
909-241-7666





_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

Reply via email to