Paul,

Life is full of ironies, but sticking with the FCC and ARRL standards prevents 
complications and
conflicts.  We have enough of those.  :)  Unlike other non-states which are 
recognized, it is
geographically contiguous.

Having grown up nearby in Maryland, with relatives who were born 
Washingtonians, I have heard many
heated debates.  Some over Thanksgiving dinner.  The District has always had an 
odd status, neither
fish now fowl, or sometimes a little of both.  If the discussion quieted down, 
I would suggest that
all the problems could be solved by retro-ceding the District to Maryland.  
Then I ducked under the
table.

73s,

Alan
WA4SCA


 

<<>>-----Original Message-----
<<>>From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org 
<<>>[mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On Behalf Of Paul Stoetzer
<<>>Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 12:04 PM
<<>>To: kk...@amsat.org
<<>>Cc: amsat-bb@AMSAT.Org
<<>>Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: DC and AMSAT Awards
<<>>
<<>>The Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, Guam, etc. all count as 
<<>>separate entities
<<>>for these awards as DXCC entities.
<<>>
<<>>I find it ironic that an organization that is incorporated 
<<>>in the District
<<>>of Columbia and had it's first headquarters in the District 
<<>>of Columbia
<<>>would not recognize that the District of Columbia is a separate and
<<>>distinct entity that is not part of the State of Maryland.
<<>>
<<>>73,
<<>>
<<>>Paul, N8HM
<<>>
<<>>
<<>>On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Bruce <kk...@amsat.org> wrote:
<<>>
<<>>> I took over processing the awards for AMSAT over 10 years 
<<>>ago and have
<<>>> processed it the same way the previous awards managers had done.
<<>>>
<<>>> You are absolutely correct that DC does not count for 
<<>>this award because
<<>>> in creating our award, we used the ARRL worked all states 
<<>>award, the RAC
<<>>> worked all provinces award and the DXCC list to create 
<<>>our award. There is
<<>>> nothing in any of those awards that include District of 
<<>>Columbia and our
<<>>> award does not either.
<<>>>
<<>>> Also, we do not include US Territories such as US Virgin 
<<>>Islands, Puerto
<<>>> Rico, and Guam and a couple other islands in our awards.
<<>>>
<<>>> 73...bruce
<<>>>
<<>>>
<<>>> On 9/24/2013 11:24 AM, Paul Stoetzer wrote:
<<>>>
<<>>>> Bruce,
<<>>>>
<<>>>> That an illogical argument. Only three states have their 
<<>>own prefixes:
<<>>>> Alaska, Hawaii, and California.
<<>>>>
<<>>>> It also ignores the fact that the District of Columbia 
<<>>is not part of
<<>>>> Maryland. Incidentally, DC is the only top-level 
<<>>subdivision of the United
<<>>>> States or Canada that does not count as a separate 
<<>>entity for this award.
<<>>>>
<<>>>> 73,
<<>>>>
<<>>>> Paul, N8HM
<<>>>>
<<>>>>
<<>>>> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Bruce <kk...@amsat.org> wrote:
<<>>>>
<<>>>>  If the FCC and ARRL would recognize the District of 
<<>>Columbia with its own
<<>>>>> prefix as the RAC has done with their provencies and 
<<>>territories then we
<<>>>>> should. However, until they do, it is included as a 
<<>>contact for Maryland.
<<>>>>>
<<>>>>> Here is the list from RAC that they use for their contests.
<<>>>>> Nova Scotia [NS] (VE1, VA1, CY9, CYØ);
<<>>>>> Quebec [QC] (VE2, VA2);
<<>>>>> Ontario [ON] (VE3, VA3);
<<>>>>> Manitoba [MB] (VE4, VA4);
<<>>>>> Saskatchewan [SK] (VE5, VA5);
<<>>>>> Alberta [AB] (VE6, VA6);
<<>>>>> British Columbia [BC] (VE7, VA7);
<<>>>>> Northwest Territories [NT] (VE8);
<<>>>>> New Brunswick [NB] (VE9);
<<>>>>> Newfoundland and Labrador [NL] (VO1, VO2);
<<>>>>> Nunavut [NU] (VYØ);
<<>>>>> Yukon [YT] (VY1);
<<>>>>> Prince Edward Island [PE] (VY2).
<<>>>>>
<<>>>>> AMSAT chose to use the same list in their award since 
<<>>AMSAT-NA includes
<<>>>>> Canada.
<<>>>>>
<<>>>>> Hope this helps.
<<>>>>>
<<>>>>> 73...bruce
<<>>>>>
<<>>>>>
<<>>>>>
<<>>>>> On 9/24/2013 9:13 AM, Paul Stoetzer wrote:
<<>>>>>
<<>>>>>  Good morning,
<<>>>>>>
<<>>>>>> I was curious about the rules for the the OSCAR 
<<>>Satellite Communications
<<>>>>>> Achievement Award, the OSCAR Sexagesimal Award, and 
<<>>the OSCAR Century
<<>>>>>> Award.
<<>>>>>>
<<>>>>>> The rules from KK5DO's website state that "A contact 
<<>>is defined as one
<<>>>>>> with
<<>>>>>> a station in another state, DXCC country or Canadian 
<<>>Provience. Once you
<<>>>>>> have a contact with a station in that area, you must 
<<>>hunt for another."
<<>>>>>>
<<>>>>>> Furthermore, the rules also state that "For those that 
<<>>have the RAC
<<>>>>>> CANDADAWARD or ARRL WAS with satellite endorsements, 
<<>>you may submit a
<<>>>>>> copy
<<>>>>>> of your certificate as proof of working the 13 
<<>>Canadian Proviences or 50
<<>>>>>> U.S. States."
<<>>>>>>
<<>>>>>> Since Canada only has ten provinces, that implies that 
<<>>the three
<<>>>>>> territories also count under the definition of 
<<>>"province."  Similarly, I
<<>>>>>> would argue that the definition of  "state" should 
<<>>also include the
<<>>>>>> District of Columbia as a separate entity since the 
<<>>precedent from
<<>>>>>> counting
<<>>>>>> the Canadian territories as "provinces" is clear.
<<>>>>>>
<<>>>>>> Does the District of Columbia count as a separate 
<<>>entity for the
<<>>>>>> purposes
<<>>>>>> of these awards?
<<>>>>>>
<<>>>>>> 73,
<<>>>>>>
<<>>>>>> Paul Stoetzer, N8HM
<<>>>>>> Washington, DC
<<>>>>>> AMSAT-NA #38,913
<<>>>>>> ______________________________****_________________
<<>>>>>>
<<>>>>>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are 
<<>>those of the
<<>>>>>> author.
<<>>>>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the 
<<>>amateur satellite
<<>>>>>> program!
<<>>>>>> Subscription settings: 
<<>>http://amsat.org/mailman/****listinfo/amsat-bb<http://amsat.
<<>>org/mailman/**listinfo/amsat-bb>
<<>>>>>> 
<<>><http://**amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/**amsat-bb<http://amsat
.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb>
<<>>>>>> >
<<>>>>>>
<<>>>>>>
<<>>>>>>  --
<<>>>>>
<<>>>>> Bruce Paige, KK5DO
<<>>>>>                       AMSAT Director Contests and Awards
<<>>>>>    ARRL Awards Manager (WAS, 5BWAS, VUCC), VE
<<>>>>>            Houston AMSAT Net - Wed 0100z on Echolink - 
<<>>Conference *AMSAT*
<<>>>>> Also live streaming MP3 at http://www.amsatnet.com
<<>>>>> Podcast at 
<<>>http://www.amsatnet.com/****podcast.xml<http://www.amsatnet.
<<>>com/**podcast.xml>
<<>>>>> 
<<>><http://www.**amsatnet.com/podcast.xml<http://www.amsatnet.c
om/podcast.xml>>or
<<>>>>> iTunes
<<>>>>>
<<>>>>>                Latest satellite news on the ARRL Audio News
<<>>>>> http://www.arrl.org
<<>>>>>
<<>>>>> AMSAT on Twitter http://www.twitter.com/amsat
<<>>>>>
<<>>>>>
<<>>>>>
<<>>>>>  ______________________________**_________________
<<>>>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are 
<<>>those of the author.
<<>>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur 
<<>>satellite program!
<<>>>> Subscription settings: 
<<>>http://amsat.org/mailman/**listinfo/amsat-bb<http://amsat.or
g/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb>
<<>>>>
<<>>>>
<<>>>
<<>>> --
<<>>>
<<>>> Bruce Paige, KK5DO
<<>>>                      AMSAT Director Contests and Awards
<<>>>   ARRL Awards Manager (WAS, 5BWAS, VUCC), VE
<<>>>           Houston AMSAT Net - Wed 0100z on Echolink - 
<<>>Conference *AMSAT*
<<>>> Also live streaming MP3 at http://www.amsatnet.com
<<>>> Podcast at 
<<>>http://www.amsatnet.com/**podcast.xml<http://www.amsatnet.co
m/podcast.xml>or iTunes
<<>>>               Latest satellite news on the ARRL Audio News
<<>>> http://www.arrl.org
<<>>>
<<>>> AMSAT on Twitter http://www.twitter.com/amsat
<<>>>
<<>>>
<<>>>
<<>>_______________________________________________
<<>>Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those 
<<>>of the author.
<<>>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur 
<<>>satellite program!
<<>>Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
<<>>


_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

Reply via email to