Re: [Amsn-devel] Something else?!

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:26:01 -0800

Hey, you should read the amsn-commits list, it was done on 17th november ;-0

Objet : [Amsn-commits] msn autoupdate.tcl,1.32,1.33
Date : 17 novembre 2005 22:07:57 HNE

Update of /cvsroot/amsn/msn
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv26417

Modified Files:
autoupdate.tcl 
Log Message:
Fixed: autoupdate now checks for all 'sections' of release numbers

Index: autoupdate.tcl
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/amsn/msn/autoupdate.tcl,v
retrieving revision 1.32
retrieving revision 1.33
diff -C2 -d -r1.32 -r1.33
*** autoupdate.tcl 17 Sep 2005 16:32:31 -0000 1.32
--- autoupdate.tcl 18 Nov 2005 03:07:55 -0000 1.33
***************
*** 530,539 ****
  set yourver [split $version "."]

! if { [lindex $lastver 0] > [lindex $yourver 0] } {
! set newer 1
! } else {
! # Major version is at least the same
! if { [lindex $lastver 1] > [lindex $yourver 1] } {
  set newer 1
  }
  }
--- 530,537 ----
  set yourver [split $version "."]

! for {set x 0} {$x<[llength "$lastver"]} {incr x} {
! if {[lindex $lastver $x] > [lindex $yourver $x]} {
  set newer 1
+ break
  }
  }



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.  Get Certified Today
Register for a JBoss Training Course.  Free Certification Exam
for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit:
_______________________________________________
Amsn-commits mailing list

Le 05-11-25 à 16:12, Youness Alaoui a écrit :

one more TODO item and pretty important :
Make sure the auto-updater recognizes 0.94 < 0.95 < 0.95.1 < 0.95.2 < 0.95.10 < 0.96

KKRT

On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 15:56:18 -0500, Youness Alaoui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Yes, I do agree.. as I said, December 1st, if nothing major appears, we release 0.95... if we can't fix the bug by december 1st, we'll use the orkaround and that's it...
Harry, maybe you didn't get the latest change because the anonymous CVS wasn't up to date... JUST IN CASE, I would suggest you get the latest cvs again and do a `make clean all`... if the bug still happens, i would really appreciate it if you did like you did at first : give us the backtrace of the segfault ...
without the backtrace from gdb, we can't find where the new bug happens...

Thanks,
KaKaRoTo

On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 15:06:19 -0500, Jérôme Gagnon-Voyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Don't forget we just have to re-enable the check for the PWC driver
at the start of aMSN. That way, the config buttons will just be
disabled so nobody will get a seg fault, that's not a "serious bug"
for a release because we can prevent the bug from happening (yes it's
better to fix the bug but at least we can prevent it)
Le 05-11-25 à 14:09, Harry Vennik a écrit :

That is to say, we thought it would be fixed now, but it is not.
At this moment I don't think anyone understands why the change by
Phil didn't
fix it. I tried to find it out this morning, but no success. I will
try again
tomorrow, if I don't get it again, and neither does anyone else,
then I think
we should not have this prevent us from releasing 0.95, even though
I regard
it as quite a serious bug.







-- 
KaKaRoTo


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
_______________________________________________
Amsn-devel mailing list

Reply via email to