It doesn't make sense to partially 8.3. If aMSN don't work well with it, and nobody cares enough to maintain 8.3 compatibility, it should be dropped to save size, and make the code more readable. If someone want's to add 8.3 support later, they can find the code in cvs. And yes, we should display a warning. We don't want bugreports about something we don't support, right?
On 11/27/05, Youness Alaoui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > since amsn now requires tcl/tk 8.4, should we change remove the code that > depends on tcl 8.3 ? > there are some bugs with binword procs, maybe we should remove the use of > these procs... > should we also display a warning if the user uses 8.3 ? and say "upgrade > to tcl/tk 8.4 or you may suffer" ? > > > -- > KaKaRoTo > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files > for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes > searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Amsn-devel mailing list > Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel > -- Thomas Geirhovd ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click _______________________________________________ Amsn-devel mailing list Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
