Hum,
I wasn't clean about the 0.95-1 thing :p
I said that to put a mess !! :p
In fact this -1 thing is the release number so if we create a
new package from
the same version (but with some modifs like a new skin or things
like
that...) we increment it. In fact, this number is distribution
specific : if
you make a debian package you will increment it but you only. My
FC4 packages
continue their road !
Don't worry about this number !! The version is 0.95 !! And the
package
release is 1
Phil
P.S. Here is the information about the FC4 package :
$ rpm -q -i -p amsn-0.95-1.fc4.i686.rpm
Name : amsn Relocations: (not
relocatable)
Version : 0.95 Vendor: (none)
Release : 1.fc4 Build Date: mar 06
déc 2005
21:06:45 CET
Install Date: (not installed) Build Host: Hal
Group : Productivity/Networking/InstantMessaging Source
RPM:
amsn-0.95-1.fc4.src.rpm
Size : 6313479 License: GPL
Signature : (none)
Packager : aMsn Team
URL : http://amsn.sourceforge.net/
Summary : Client MSN Messenger pour Linux
Description :
amsn est un client Microsoft Messenger (MSN) pour UNIX, Windows et
Macintosh écrit en Tcl/Tk. Il supporte les tranferts de
fichiers, les
groupes et beaucoup d'autres possibilités...
Visitez http://amsn.sourceforge.net/ pour de plus amples détails.
Le Samedi 10 Décembre 2005 19:57, Youness Alaoui a écrit :
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO toi meme!!! :P
I'm sorry, but I don't want to release a 0.95.1 release without
release
0.95! and I don't want to release both at the same time...
we're not confusing ANYBODY, and we're not fucking anything, we
can't make
a NEW release if there wasn't any before...
All we did is 'tag' the release in CVS, but the 0.95 release
was never
OUT!!!!
let me find an analogy, it's like when you 'want to go to
mcDonals', you
go out and once you get there, you say "hey, there's a XXXXX
restaurant in
front of mcDo's I'll go there".. then, are you forced to get to
mcDo
before going to the other restaurant ? would you say that
you're not
hungry anymore because you 'though of going to mcDo' even if
you didn't go
there ? no.. it's the same thing here (sorry for the worst
analogy I ever
made :P) we wanted to release 0.95, we tagged cvs (similar to
going out
until we reach mcdo) but we never released 0.95 (didn't enter
mcdo), so we
can release 0.95 with the latest CVS now without any worries
because noone
knows about it!
anyways... we may talk about it later on msn, I'm tired now...
what do other devels think ?
KaKaRoTo
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 13:48:44 -0500, Jérôme Gagnon-Voyer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
>
> 0.95 is done we said it.
> 0.95.1 is the next release.
>
> We tag a NEW release. This is to be sure we don't confuse
packages.
>
> Le 05-12-10 à 13:46, Youness Alaoui a écrit :
>> no, look, 0.95 will be out, the CVS tag 0.95 isn't the final
one, I
>> will retag a 0.95 and we'll create a new "0.95" release
since this
>> one is hidden from everyone...
>> now the thing is, one we create the packages, we're still
not going
>> to release!!! because we'll be waiting for the website...
>> now my question was, we're going to release 0.95, I'm going
to tag
>> a new 0.95 (this is what Jerome called 0.95-1) and I want it
to be
>> more stable with language files updated.. so I say "r we
sure it's
>> ok now?" I found a few problems with webcam : if capture
extension
>> is not compiled, there is no warning... the webcam isn't even
>> canceled.. but that is not critical because if it doesn't
work, the
>> user will launch the wizard... and capture not compiled will
not
>> exist in binary packages...
>> about languages, I'll be waiting for Harry or Hatredman to
give me
>> their 'go'.
>> the pakcages will be created in time once these two issues are
>> finished (I get approval of everyone saying "yes, I think we're
>> stable", and I see no 'new' bugs in the bug system for
cvs... and
>> lang maintainers tell me 'we're good here'), then either we
release
>> when we get the packages ready, if Lee gives us his 'go', if
not,
>> the packages will stay there and be waiting for Lee's
approval once
>> the website will be finished and ready...
>> now my question was :
>> for the website, what is still remaining ? what's the
status ? can
>> I get a time estimates on what's remaining to do ?
>> for stability, I do understand there's not much we can do now
>> for languages, I'd also like if possible to have a status,
how many
>> languages are in the queue, and time estimates on when they
will be
>> incorporated to CVS... I just updated and saw a lot of lang
files
>> changin, so I guess we're almost there on this topic..
>> for packages, we'll do it as fast as we can, but I assume it
will
>> take 1 day or a max of 2 days, this is my time estimates (I can
>> provide the packages in the same day, I expect Phil to do
the same
>> for his rpms, and we'll just be waiting for other packagers
which I
>> would like them to be as fast as we are)
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep
through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that
makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD
SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Amsn-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
