Op vrijdag 20 oktober 2006 14:14, schreef NoWhereMan: > OT: I don't know if I told you; generally speaking of interfaces and > designing, XUL looks interesting, doesn't it? it's completely skinnable, > integrates well with all systems, and uses javascript as a scripting > language (which really is not bad IMO). > XUL apps wouldn't have to rely on firefox to run, using XUL Runner, and > still you have a good engine with XML and DOM manipulation bult-in. There are a lot of good things to say about XUL indeed, but there are some problems/limitations that kept us from using it for amsn2. If you want to know more about that, search the archives for the thread 'XML2GUI' (ca. July 2006).
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Amsn-devel mailing list Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
