In fact this is the sole purpose for this "reference" field I think, to be
able to show threads even if the subject changes ...
Karel.
2007/5/12, Vivia Nikolaidou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Sat, 12 May 2007, Philippe Valembois - Phil wrote:
> About this 0.97 thread : Vivia you renamed it but you did reply so your
> Mail client added a References field in your headers :
> 37 References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 38 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 39 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> So everybody who display its mail using threads view will see it as a
> children of these previously referenced mails...
Well, in gmail (as well as a couple of webmail clients that I've used) the
mail client is reasonable enough to understand that, if the mail subject
is changed, people are talking about something else (like the "Michael
Moore" fork or the one I am just beginning), so it goes to another thread.
Until now, I really thought that keeping mail with the same References
field but another subject in the same thread was a stupidity - like, "how
come they didn't think of this". I didn't know it was standard behavior :o
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Amsn-devel mailing list
Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Amsn-devel mailing list
Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
