On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 6:16 PM Vendula Poncova <vponc...@redhat.com> wrote:

>
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 9:56 AM Danishka Navin <danis...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jirka,
>>
>> I used the following command but did't use --product and --version at all.
>> Btw, does livecd-creator read from /etc/os-release when we ignore both
>> --product and --version?
>>
>> livecd-creator --verbose --config=hanthana-live-workstation.ks
>> --fslabel=h30 --cache=cache --tmpdir=tmp
>>
>> Then I copied fresh kisktars shipped by fedora and rerun with my custom
>> configs.
>> I could not reproduce the issue.
>>
>> I wonder if the issue caused by following entries in the /etc/os-release
>> file.
>>
>> REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT="Fedora"
>> REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="Fedora"
>>
>>
>> Btw, there is a new issue occurred.
>> As in this image, Anaconda keeps duplicating the values of redhat-release
>> file.
>> I am not sure if its a bug or I mage a mistake.
>>
>> https://pasteboard.co/IvvT4nf.png
>>
>> Added Hanthana Workstation (Vishwa)' in to the redhat-release file.
>> https://pasteboard.co/IvvSiU5.png
>>
>> If you have digital at the end, it only repeats the digit.
>> When using "Hanthana 30"
>> https://pasteboard.co/IvvTyBT.png
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 1:06 PM <jkone...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> You have probably used bad parameters when you were invoking lorax. You
>>> have to use correct --product and --version parameters otherwise we will be
>>> handling your ISO as Rawhide.
>>>
>>> Could you please tell us what command did you used to create your ISO?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Jirka
>>>
>>> On Sat, 2019-08-31 at 18:12 +0530, Danishka Navin wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> When I was trying to install f30 based remixed ISO,
>>> "PRE-RELEASE/TESTING" text appearing in top-right hand side of anaconda GUI.
>>> May I know what could cause this?
>>>
>>>
> Hello,
>
> for Live ISO, there is a little crazy logic that sets up the flag for a
> final release:
>
> https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/blob/master/data/liveinst/liveinst#L93
>
> Basically, it is determined by a version of a package that provides
> system-release, so I would check that.
>
> What is the output of these commands, when you run them on your ISO?
> rpm -q  --whatprovides system-release
> rpm -q --qf '%{Release}' --whatprovides system-release
>


$ rpm -q  --whatprovides system-release
fedora-release-workstation-30-900.noarch
$ rpm -q --qf '%{Release}' --whatprovides system-release
900[



> Vendy
>
>
>> both os-release and redhat-release updated and I can see given values.
>>> both fedora and fedora-update repos used during the ISO build along with
>>> few 3rd party repos.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> --
>>> Danishka Navin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>> Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
>>>
>>> Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
>>> Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Danishka Navin
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
>> Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list



-- 
Danishka Navin
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

Reply via email to