Hi Jiří, Vendula, all, On Tue, 2021-02-09 at 12:12 +0100, Vendula Poncova wrote: > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 10:42 AM <jkone...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I see a few options for this. First is to add this directly to > > blivet > > library as you pointed out already. However, I don't think blivet > > developers would be happy about that because they are trying to be > > as > > much as possible general purpose library and this change is really > > just > > about Anaconda. > > > > Another option seems to be to modify Anaconda code directly. > > Unfortunately, I can't tell from top of my mind how hard that would > > be > > but still seems like the easiest solution. > > > > However, the best approach which I can think of is to add something > > like that to our configuration files. Benefit would be that another > > modifications like that could be done easily in the future. That is > > of > > course for a discussion for the Anaconda team because it could be > > pretty hard to implemented this in some common form. > > > > Vendy, Vojta, do you have some better ideas or could you tell us > > something more about my ideas above? > > > > Best Regards, > > Jirka > > > > On Tue, 2021-02-09 at 01:18 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 1:09 AM Michel Alexandre Salim > > > <mic...@michel-slm.name> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2021-02-08 at 21:02 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > This is in regards to this Fedora 34 change: > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BtrfsTransparentCompression#Scope > > > > > > > > > > The gist is to do 'mount -o compress=zstd:1' anytime Btrfs is > > > > > used, > > > > > whether Destination Installation>Automatic or Custom or > > > > > Advanced-Custom. Apply it during the installation, and add it > > > > > to > > > > > /etc/fstab. > > > > > > > > > > Somehow I got confused thinking that autopart supports -- > > > > > fsoptions, > > > > > and that would be the way to do this. But (a) --fsoptions > > > > > isn't > > > > > supported with autopart, and (b) it wouldn't be a universal > > > > > approach > > > > > anyway. And we want this to be consistent. Now I'm thinking > > > > > it > > > > > needs > > > > > to go somewhere in: > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/storaged-project/blivet/blob/3.4-devel/blivet/devices/btrfs.py > > > > > > > > > > Am I on the right track, or does it need to go somewhere > > > > > else, or > > > > > in > > > > > addition to that? > > > > > > > > > (I'm one of the change owners, and trying to figure this out > > > > with > > > > Chris). > > > > > > > > Ideally we have a solution that is configurable - i.e. this is > > > > exposed > > > > via a kickstart command (and probably entailing changes in > > > > Anaconda > > > > and > > > > pykickstart), but if that is not possible, or require a lot of > > > > rework > > > > (which we can try to work on), if we are willing to carry a > > > > patch > > > > for > > > > blivet or some other component to override the behavior just > > > > for > > > > Fedora > > > > 34, what's the best way of achieving that? > > > > > > > > Btrfs is probably the only filesystem with built-in compression > > > > that we > > > > potentially care about, so designing an interface to expose > > > > this > > > > functionality might be an overkill -- but we're not sure. > > > > > > > > > > Eventually, VDO might get integrated into the mainline tree, so > > > having > > > the interface which could be used for LVM compression through VDO > > > wouldn't be too bad. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello! > > The change says: "On variants using btrfs as the default filesystem, > enable transparent compression using zstd." It means that the > compression has to be configurable per product, so we need to add a > new configuration option to the Anaconda configuration files > (something like btrfs_compression_enabled = True). I guess you > planned > to use interactive-defaults.ks, but we are going to replace this file > with the configuration files anyway. > > I have checked the Blivet's code and we might be able to redefine the > _mount_class attribute of the BTRFS class. The mount class defines > default mount options. That should be enough to fix all partitioning > methods. What do you think, Vojta? > > Vendy > > _______________________________________________ > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list > Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list >
I took an initial stab at this -- would this be the way to achieve this by overriding `_mount_class` in Blivet only? https://github.com/storaged-project/blivet/pull/930 (for 3.4-devel) https://github.com/storaged-project/blivet/pull/931 (for 3.3-devel) Presumably this might be too specific to get merged upstream, but could be something we can apply as patches against Fedora's python-blivet RPM while we work out a more generic solution. Vendula: is the more generic configuration mechanism supposed to work like this? - specify in an Anaconda config file that we want to override some options (which file would this be?) - if this flag is set, when Anaconda tells Blivet it wants a Btrfs filesystem, override `_mount_class` (so the code for the new class can live in Anaconda but subclasses a Blivet class) There's a further complication: Chris just informed me that on BIOS systems, space is more of a constraint so the zstd module is not part of GRUB ... meaning we have to handle these two scenarios: - if /boot is a directory on a / btrfs file system, we need to override the compression property for it before any files get written there, *or* defragment the files in %post - if /boot is a separate btrfs file system, we need to make sure we don't compress it so we might need to either use a separate BTRFSBootMount class, or use the standard FSMount, but also somehow prevent BTRFSMount to be used if the mount point is /boot Oh what a tangled web we weave... thoughts on all this? And thanks for the useful pointers, -- Michel Alexandre Salim profile: https://keyoxide.org/mic...@michel-slm.name chat via email: https://delta.chat/ GPG key: 5DCE 2E7E 9C3B 1CFF D335 C1D7 8B22 9D2F 7CCC 04F2
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list