On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, Peter Love wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't think the following can currently be done -- please point me in
> the right direction if they can be.
>
> In the future, would it be possible to have PROCTIME categories greater
> than 300? For example, following the current category pattern,
> 300-500, 500-1000, ... (One of our servers sometimes has timeouts set
> somewhere from 900 to 1800 s).
>
Yeah, I guess. I just assumed 5 minutes was about as long as anyone would
wait anyway.
In fact, you can easily make the edit yourself if you're compiling your own
version. Just change the thresholds ptthresh in globals.c, and the names
ptnames1 and ptnames2 in output.c.
> In the future, would it be possible to have some INCLUDE/EXCLUDE
> mechanism for PROCTIME categories? It would be very useful to be able
> to do something like only include processing times greater than some
> threshold.
>
Hmmm. That would be more difficult, but I'll think about it.
--
Stephen Turner http://www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/~sret1/
Statistical Laboratory, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge, CB3 0WB, England
"The new operating system will recover more easily from system crashes."
(Microsoft, aiming high with Windows Millennium)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this
mailing list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe" in the main BODY OF THE MESSAGE.
List archived at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
