On 2005-01-07 17:56:00 -0600, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: > what's wrong with piping your log file through a little awk sript if > you're not happy with timestamps in there and want to massage them a > bit before processing?
This is not my job to do this kind of things. > This way, if you want combined statistics from several mirror sites > running in different timezones on different OS/server software, > *you* fix the timestamps the way *you* want and then analog will > just do its thing. Fix? They are *correct*. > What you're proposing involves creating a portable date-analyzing > AI, botling it on top of a logfile analyzer, and praying it doesn't > quietly screw up your timestamps every time you run the analysis. I'm not. Writing the timezone in the form +hhmm or -hhmm is standard. This wouldn't really be complicated to read it. -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help | | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives +------------------------------------------------------------------------
