Nick Altmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> It's not as good as a full 64-bit version (any progress on that >> front?), but it may give some of you a little more breathing room.
My interest in the 64-bit version was purely academic - when I documented the process for compiling the 32-bit Windows version, I checked to see whether a 64-bit version would be a possibility, but the 64-bit version of MinGW was a very early alpha at that point. I had a quick look at the project page today (http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/0, and it's still listed as alpha, but the discussion forum indicates that it's a bit more usable at this point. If I had the time (and a pressing need), I'd invest an afternoon in trying to get it working, but I think I'll leave it on the to-do list for now :-) Aengus +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help | | Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general +------------------------------------------------------------------------
