Bah - all covered above. I should not answer emails early in the morning. But: if you still want that data, I am happy to see if I can grab it ;).
On 11 June 2014 08:04, Oliver Keyes <[email protected]> wrote: > I thiiink (don't quote me on this) the NT schema contains wiki data. I'll > see if I can stitch together an aggregate dataset for you, if you think > it'd help. Per-day granular enough? > > > On 11 June 2014 06:54, Federico Leva (Nemo) <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Federico Leva (Nemo), 01/06/2014 14:11: >> >> Currently I'm in need of per-wiki and/or >>> diachronic/over-time plots for it.wiki: >>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:The_sudden_ >>> decline_of_Italian_Wikipedia> >>> >>> >>> If nobody has ideas I guess I'll just go for the 800 lb gorilla approach >>> and submit a patch to have performance graphs for the top 10 wikis as we >>> currently do for edits (cf. https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/56039 )? In >>> the meanwhile: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/136631/ >>> >> >> Those two are closed but I can't just steal the editswiki approach >> because it's based on the series' values; absent better ideas I'll need to >> hardcode the wikis' names. >> >> Not for that goal, but mostDeviant can be of use too: < >> https://graphite.readthedocs.org/en/latest/functions.html# >> graphite.render.functions.mostDeviant> >> For instance, a graph of sites/kinds of assets whose payload varied the >> most across last week. http://ur1.ca/hi4oa Can something like this be of >> use anywhere? >> >> >> Nemo >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Analytics mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics >> > > > > -- > Oliver Keyes > Research Analyst > Wikimedia Foundation > -- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
