Coordination on Monday sounds good. On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Ori Livneh <[email protected]> wrote:
> Nuria, > > Toby asked me on Friday if I could help, and I gave a weak "ummmmm...... > sure". I haven't begun working on it or anything. Announcing it to the list > is Toby's way of making sure I don't back out. It's why he gets the big > Director salary. :) Let's coordinate on Monday? > > Best, > Ori > > On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Nuria Ruiz <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Looks like Ori is working on replacing vanadium. >> There is a ticket created to that effect: >> https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T90363 >> >> However, I am not sure the best way to proceed forward is to change two >> things at the same time (the db and vanadium). >> But since that is purely and ops tasks you guys know what's best. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Sean Pringle <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Dan Andreescu <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > It seems to me that we should do the Vanadium hardware upgrade at the >>> same >>> > time, if we're going to have down time anyway. Can we bring the new >>> beefier >>> > box online? Last time I talked to Ori I understood such a box was >>> already >>> > set aside for this by ops. >>> >>> Oooh I didn't (and don't) know about this. Fair enough; one chunk of >>> scheduled downtime is fine with me, though I don't know how long it >>> will need to be if we include vanadium. If we do only the database >>> split it will be five minutes. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Analytics mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics >>> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
