Besides the existing Meta-wiki page that Nemo seems to prefer, it might be also worth reviewing and comparing the standard definition used for readership data (pageviews, unique devices...), which I believe is encoded at [1]. And perhaps also the conceptual work that originally went into it [2] (although I believe we since deviated from it by e.g. including chapter wikis in the pageview data).
[1] https://github.com/wikimedia/analytics-refinery-source/blob/ master/refinery-core/src/main/java/org/wikimedia/analytics/ refinery/core/PageviewDefinition.java#L75 [2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Page_view/Gener alised_filters#Filtering_to_applicable_sites On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 6:40 PM, Neil Patel Quinn <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey everyone! > > As you probably know, the Wikimedia cluster includes not just "normal" > wikis like English Wikipedia and Albanian Wiktionary, but odd ones like the > Wikimedia > Belgium chapter website <https://be.wikimedia.org>, Test Wikidata > <https://test.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Main_Page>, and the English > Wikipedia Working Group on Ethnic and Cultural Edit Wars wiki > <https://wg-en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page>. > > As far as I know, however, there's no standard definition of "normal" wiki > to use when doing analysis. > > So I've started meta:Research:Wiki > <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wiki> with draft definitions of > "public wikis" and "content wikis", along with some initial documentation > about wiki metadata (names, project groups, etc.) which I plan to continue > to work on. > > I encourage you to edit or comment on the talk page! > > -- > Neil Patel Quinn <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Neil_P._Quinn-WMF> > (he/him/his) > product analyst, Wikimedia Foundation > -- Tilman Bayer Senior Analyst Wikimedia Foundation IRC (Freenode): HaeB
_______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
