> But I still think his inner class should be static (as in the > document) because to instantiate an inner non-static class, you'd > first need the super class object
sorry, *outer* class, not 'super' class ... On Sep 20, 12:53 pm, "John P." <johnny.d.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > He's taking the inner class route, and yes he does provide the full > path to the class according to his first post. > > But I still think his inner class should be static (as in the > document) because to instantiate an inner non-static class, you'd > first need the super class object; whereas to instantiate an inner > static class, you can just instantiate it. I'd be very impressed if > Android's XML layout can handle both cases. =) > > On Sep 20, 12:43 pm, martin-g ml <mg.mli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Did you provide the full name of the class ? > > > Something like <com.mycompany.RunningTaskGallery> ? > > > El dom, 20-09-2009 a las 09:57 -0600, Justin Anderson escribió: > > > > Making it static doesn't change anything, except that I get the > > > following again: > > > > 09-19 22:04:09.824: ERROR/AndroidRuntime(2716): Caused by: > > > java.lang.NoSuchMethodException: RunningTaskGallery > > > (Context,AttributeSet) > > > > The constructor that takes a Context and an AttributeSet does indeed > > > exist and it calls the parent's constructor. Both my class and > > > constructors are public. > > > > However, accodring to the Dev Guide documentation it shouldn't matter > > > if it is static or not. In fact, it gives an alternative way to > > > reference it if it is static, but states that you can use either > > > approach. > > > > In my particular case I do not want it to be static. > > > > Thanks, > > > Justin > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > There are only 10 types of people in the world... > > > Those who know binary and those who don't. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 9:29 AM, John P. <johnny.d.p...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > Maybe it should be static, like the NotePad example has in > > > > > > http://developer.android.com/guide/samples/NotePad/src/com/example/an... > > > > public static class LinedEditText extends EditText { ... > > > > On Sep 20, 10:19 am, Justin Anderson <janderson....@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > It is a public non-static class. > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Justin > > > > > On Sep 20, 2009 1:11 AM, "skink" <psk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Sep 19, 8:13 am, MagouyaWare <magouyaw...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > However, > > > > this results in: java.l... > > > > and what about its visibility? is it public? > > > > > pskink --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to android-beginners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-beginners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-beginners?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
