I hope your right. I guess if they were to DQ my submission for this, I couldn't really argue. Glad I submitted multiple applications.
On Apr 26, 8:51 pm, afonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Very interesting points, I guess we'll find out soon enough how strict > the judging will be regarding any unresolved licensing issues and > assumptions made by developers. For GCab the intention would be to > formalize a licensing agreement with Google to allow for provision (c) > regarding dispatching. I don't expect they'd require us to have all > this worked out ahead of time considering the platform is still in > development and many developers like myself are individuals without > corporate legal resources. > > I think if the judges feel that a particular application has merit > showcasing the Android platform and potentially commercially viable > they would not only fund the further development (prize money) but > also encourage collaboration with regards to these types of licensing > issues. > > Ultimately, I think the point of the competition from Google’s > perspective is to find the next “killer” applications that will > showcase the Android platform and not about using legal technicalities > to disqualify applications. Come to think of it, given the diverse > backgrounds of the judges I’m not sure if they’d even be familiar with > these sorts of issues unless they read the licensing agreements for > all the API’s and technologies that Android encompasses. > > So I’m still keeping my fingers crossed for GCab. :) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Challenge" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
