Thanks Dan for the understanding. I guess all who are participating the ADC are anxiously waiting ...
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Dan Morrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not calling out anyone in particular, but I do want to remind folks to > keep it friendly. > I remember reading a post here where someone said something like "I have > been working on my app in the evenings after I put my kids to bed." Those > are a dedicated and passionate sort of people that deserve better than being > called "whiners" or "insane", even if they are being a little > over-sensitive. People have put a lot of work into their apps, and I find > it perfectly natural for them to be thirsty for information. > > > To those who are waiting, I will quote Morpheus: "Rest Neo. The answers > are coming." ;) > > - Dan > > > On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 9:21 PM, Chris D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I thought about flaming after I saw all the complainers, but thanks > > for doing it for me. Wow, what a bunch of whiners developers are hey? > > > > On May 2, 6:07 pm, Incognito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I forgot to include another one and the most likely one. > > > D) This is a conspiracy and the judges failed your application because > > > they have in for you. They liked your application so much that they > > > purposedly failed your application so they can steal it. > > > > > > On May 2, 7:05 pm, Incognito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > One more thing, in the music business producers will only need to > > hear > > > > a person for a minute or less to determine whether they like the > > > > person or not. Same is the thing here. They do not need to spend > > half > > > > an hour testing your application to determine whether they like it > > or > > > > not. So if you only got a minute or so,well, I'm sorry to tell you > > > > this but it could be that: > > > > > > > A) Your application stinks from the judges perspective and no matter > > > > how much you want them to look at it the longer they look at it the > > > > stronger the stench. > > > > B)Your application had a problem and failed to load or work as you > > > > expected, this would not be unusual given that these are all first > > > > versions and have not been thoroughly tested, even if you claim you > > > > did. Things always fail when somebody other than you tests the > > > > application. Belive me, I have several years of experience and this > > is > > > > very true. > > > > C)The judge got confused on how to use your application (I'm being > > > > nice here so that you can blame it on the judge, of course it is not > > > > your application, it is perfect, a work of art, and this is the only > > > > reason you did not win!) > > > > > > > On May 2, 5:25 pm, Incognito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Fourth, we need an escalation process if we can prove that our > > > > > > application was not evaluated fairly. We are dealing with > > globally- > > > > > > written apps being globally evaluated – at a minimum, there are > > bound > > > > > > to some language and cultural miscommunications. > > > > > > > > What are you? Insane? This will never happen. Seems to me like you > > > > > rather work the angles rather than win the competition like > > everybody > > > > > else.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Challenge" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
