>>> "Winning guarantees only 25K. Nothing more, Nothing less."

>> Thats not exactly true.  Winning will guarantee some press.

Ha, let me rephrase. Winning does not guarantee success even though it might
guarantee some press ;)

On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> I hear you.  Reread my post.  I'm going forward regardless.  I was
> just saying to those who thought expanding the prizes beyond the 50
> would be unfair.  I doubt it would happen, but if it did, unfair or
> not, I'll be happy to take it.
>
> "Winning guarantees only 25K. Nothing more, Nothing less."
>
> Thats not exactly true.  Winning will guarantee some press.  It will
> also help you get more funding, because people are far more likely to
> fund an app that google thinks is a good idea.  I have a list of
> numbers at the ready.  Getting that top 50 nod would've made that
> phone call a lot easier.  That's far more valuable than 25k.
>
> On May 6, 1:25 am, "Muthu Ramadoss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Kevin,
> >
> > Agree, there might be more than 50 great ideas. You can't take anything
> for
> > granted by winning or losing. Just like there would be successful ideas
> > outside of the top 50, there will also be failures in the top 50 winning
> > applications.
> >
> > Your idea might be good. You might have won the challenge. You might
> have
> > lost the challenge. Your application kicks butt. Your application bites
> > dust. Your application might have been treated fairly. Your application
> > might have been prejudiced.
> >
> > But will any of the above is going to seriously enhance or hamper your
> > vision? I doubt so.
> >
> > Winning guarantees only 25K. Nothing more, Nothing less. We can
> guarantee
> > something more for ourself. We can guarantee something that no one will
> be
> > able to take it away from us. We can guarantee something that we can
> > control. We can guarantee something that is realistic.
> >
> > We can work hard at being the best. We can work hard to change the
> world. We
> > can work hard to build something that makes people happy. We can work
> hard
> > to build something that our folks find it easy to use. We can work hard
> to
> > keep at it as long as we can, as long as it takes.
> >
> > Your success or failure is not something others decide. Its you, who
> does
> > that.
> >
> > Good luck.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Kevin Galligan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > "coding my submission took just few days" ... "I think we get
> > > understandably nervous"
> >
> > > What are you nervous about?  A few days?
> >
> > > What I've wanted since the beginning was a fair shake.  As stated all
> > > over the place, my app got like 1 to 2 looks max.  I put far more than
> > > a few days into it.  My life was on hold for quite a while.  I've
> > > blown off a number of people and lived on 5 hours of sleep a night for
> > > a long time.
> >
> > > I plan to go forward regardless of what happens with the contest,
> > > although I have no idea what I'm going to do about supporting that
> > > financially.  I'll take any cash (or a phone, or whatever) to help
> > > with that effort, and if somebody thinks that's unfair, I'll send you
> > > a cheese plate and a nice hand written apology/condolence card.
> >
> > > I don't expect anything.  I'd be surprised if I got a direct email
> > > from anybody, much less anything of substance.  Like I said up top,
> > > though.  What if there are more than 50 good ideas?
> >
> > > On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Eugene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > >  On May 5, 10:34 pm, SatG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >  > As we all participated in the ADC and we all now excelled the
> skills
> > > >  > in Android. how about GOOGLE thinking of employing the persons
> > > >  > developed application for ADC?
> >
> > > >  Let's not be overly enthusiastic. E.g. coding my submission took
> just
> > > >  few days, after a week of studying docs. Which can suggest two
> things:
> >
> > > >  - Barrier for entry was pretty low, since the framework/toolkit was
> so
> > > >  usable for newcomers
> > > >  - Not all, but likely many of us have only cursory experience with
> it.
> >
> > > >  I think we get understandably nervous with announcements
> approaching,
> > > >  but let's keep ourself cool and our expectations in check. We knew
> the
> > > >  rules when we rolled it, let's not expect things that weren't
> written
> > > >  there. Then if Google donates anything over - power to them. If
> not,
> > > >  we'd not be in for any disappointment.
> >
> > --
> > take care,
> > Muthu Ramadoss.
> >
> > http://mobeegal.in
> > find stuff closer.
> >
>


-- 
take care,
Muthu Ramadoss.

http://mobeegal.in
find stuff closer.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Android Challenge" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to