Be positive. We may lost. Our apps may get no hit. But if then somebody realize our dream ... implements our ideas, and it serving global community ... at the end, we have our God which will give more to us :) Why ? Because we are serving people ...
With this perspective ... nothing to lose :) It is the age of participation, the age of sharing ... It may be also our way to pay back to Google who already serve as with great search engine. For Sergey and Larry who do their homework in their lab to develop scalable, reliable data mining algorithm. On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Google Watch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is the Android Challenge legit or an elaborate form of phishing, > or even an outright scam of sorts? > > It seems that the challenge has a few glaring problems: > 1) The rules favor teams and/or individuals with financial > backing or resources. > The Challenge is scored in 4 areas. I suggest that Originality > and Indispensibility are areas that favor contributors equally > whether they are poor individuals or well funded teams. > However "Effective Use of the Android Platform" and > "Polish and Appeal" penalize those with limited financial > resources. These qualities require more time to implement > thereby favoring those who could spend more time on the > challenge than those who responded to the challenge > in the "Willy Wonka" spirit (believing all had a chance) > and had to work on the challenge in their spare time. > > 2) Google discontinued support for the Challenge users > while continuing to support OHA and other stakeholders > (e.g., device manufacturers, MIT) thereby marginalizing/ > under supporting the Challenge members. > Using the Android platform, which > despite being Linux and Java, is no picnic or walk in the park. > The processing model is *different* (and I'll question it's necessity > on a Linux platform in another post), the SDK has bugs, the > documentation has inconsistencies (e.g., look at the various > places where TableLayout and table row are documented), > pieces of the SDK were missing (e.g., BT, etc.) and so on. > And while independents were toiling away trying to slog through > the Android'isms and bugs, Google was actively supporting members > of the OHA (are they really on the same SDK version as we are?) > Are all submitters *really* isolated from those who had more > inside information? Access to the source? > > 3) Participants who fail to win in round 1 stand to lose even more. > When you made your submission you agreed that if Google > or any of the Judges developed your idea you had no recourse. > What if Google/Judges never had the idea before you submitted it? > Had not yet visualized it on the Android platform before the > entries were submitted? Do you think you can get your idea to > market faster than the multi-billion dollar Google juggernaut? > In it's most perverse form isn't it all really a way for Google > to potentially get 1700+ original ideas for which they only > need to pay for 50? > > /GW > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it > now.<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51733/*http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ> > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Challenge" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
