On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:07 PM, wave connexion(BQ) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Javqui, very interesting your video, this kind of adventure always
> encouraging.
>
> Shane, you have to win the heart of regular developers in this community,
> serve them.

Actually, I'm not a servant of the Android community; I'm part of the
community and doing my best to help out.


> I can see helloandroid has more apps listed and rated than SlideMe even
> though the latter has more appealing UI to offer.

And? Does helloandroid provide the community an Android client? Can
helloandroid deliver content to a device? Is helloandroid holding an awards
contest to put a little extra money in developer's pockets? Is helloandroid
going to be able to connect end-users and developers in a social network? If
your criteria is: "I'm going to put my application in the 'database' that
has the most apps" then go for it. Ask developers in the J2ME space how that
worked out for them.


> I saw a previous post you were not willing to test other developer's apps
> in a mutual way, maybe that is one of problems you have. Good luck.

That's not true.

Shane

>
>
>  On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Shane Isbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>  On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 6:14 PM, GodsMoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> If I had to choose between a gFund and a Google AppStore (without the
>>> restrictions) I'd have to go with the Google AppStore. I know projects
>>> like SlideMe are cool but they don't have nearly the clout that a
>>> Google AppStore would have.
>>> Google Needs An AppStore!
>>
>> Actually, I also agree that Google should have an AppStore: it's good for
>> the end-users.  But what do such AppStores provide to individual
>> developers? Maybe you can get your application provisioned, but if you are
>> competing with 500 large content providers (NFL, Disney), you are going to
>> get buried pretty quickly and most users willl never even be able to find
>> your app.
>>
>> Shane
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On May 8, 8:07 pm, javqui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > It's amazing.
>>> > I was writing something about the gFund to post tonight. I search on
>>> > this discussion group for words like "VC" "Venture Capital" , gFund
>>> > before post it.
>>> >
>>> > My title was: "Entrepreneurs coffee break, proposal: Google as a VC
>>> > promoter. "The gFund ?". I propose change the title to catch the
>>> > attention inside this community.
>>> >
>>> > I will complement this excellent post with some additional ideas:
>>> >
>>> > ... Google has the documents, applications, and scores. Google has a
>>> > well filtered database with all our information and our dreams.
>>> >
>>> > Google could re-sort all judges' scores focusing on innovation and
>>> > marketing opportunities (1 and 4 elements), and request a voluntary BP
>>> > to us with an extension of "terms and conditions" to release our BP,
>>> > readme and apk to a selected group of VC, similar to Apple with KPCB -
>>> > iFund VC. (KPCB was a VC for Google with around $25M in 1999)
>>> > The reason for re-sorting is to change the challenge priorities (Good
>>> > applications ready to release in very short term to get advertising
>>> > and publicity) for Venture priorities.
>>> >
>>> > This will help us a lot to build our dreams.
>>> > I'm pretty sure that many people in this android-challenge group could
>>> > reorganize these ideas and write a better proposal, so this post is
>>> > open to build a real proposal....
>>> > -----------------
>>> >
>>> > In other words, I want to share with this very special community my
>>> > last work before the cellular phones (in special android) came to my
>>> > life.
>>> > It's an example of hard work fighting for dreams. This is the first
>>> > public release, after FAA stop my flights (and the local police also)
>>> > in July 2007. UAV or UAS are not regulated yet in USA.  This is about
>>> > 2 min. high condensed video.
>>> > Many people talk in this group about 5 months of work on the same
>>> > idea. This work took over 3 years, Monday to Monday 10 hours average
>>> > work with short family stops. I think is the limit between obsession
>>> > and determination.
>>> > This work is not my submitted application to android challenge. The
>>> > submitted application has more innovation, based in qty of filled
>>> > patents. (it's a joke, but really have more patents pending)
>>> >
>>> > So, enjoy the video: http;//www.blicopter.com/android
>>> >
>>> > Javier Quintana, javqui
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
> --
> BQ
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Android Challenge" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to