I doubt they will give the feedback. If they do, it might expose that the judging criteria was not strictly followed and that there were internal criteria (e.g. 1 slot for MIT team, 1 slot for the weather channel, 1 slot for cooking, no games, 50% of the winners are from US and 50% goes to non-US entries, )
On May 13, 2:59 pm, farstar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Google, > > I think that one of the key requests of ADC I participants is the > valuable feedback for their own application. > Also I guess that, for the company, any official provision of internal > scoring results can cause many unexpected problems and, moreover, this > is out of obligation. > But I think we share the fact that even minimum feedback including > experts' opinion is really valuable for individual developers, > especially, who are considering further opportunities with Android. > I'm sure this can be beneficial effect on developers as well as > potential customers because this can be clue for more evolved > applications. > > I think Google can devise formal but soft formula for this feedback. > > For example, how about soft feedback instead of full detailed score > report? > > Relative strength in 4 criteria of Application XXX > (1) Effective use of Android (this criteria only, ranked at top > 400~449 out of 1788) > (2) Polish and Appeal > (3) Originality > (4) Indispensibility > > Relative strength for 4 judging criteria with the rough score for the > highest valued criteria only. > Individual mail for each and every non-winning participants. > > Please consider this suggestion. > Thanks. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Challenge" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
