Can someone comment on wheather any of the Locale app is in fact a google employee (internal or external associate?) this is interesting
On 14 Μάϊος, 06:55, Shamim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Dan: > > Nice to see your answer. Have you ever been in south Asian country or > might have seen some Hindi Movie. Your comments like "I am not > familiar with the Facebook group and I don't know how it's run", this > nice. All the corrupted politician when the accused by media or people > then they put this kind of statement. It's in the world news that a > commercial boss of Google is moving to facebook and you are saying you > don't know about facebook. At least you could have found the fact, how > the facebook work before writing any comments. Your statement is not > professional at all, we don't expect like this statement from any > Google guy. We feel Google is always a place of professional. > > > I can't comment on that" > > On May 14, 1:41 am, "Dan Morrill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > That "disclaimer" is definitely official; I don't do unofficial posts. > > Employees of any Alliance member company, including Google, are not and > > were not eligible for the Challenge. As you point out, the rules clearly > > state that anyone who is an employee of one the Alliance member companies at > > any time during the Challenge is not eligible. > > I am not familiar with the Facebook group and I don't know how it's run, so > > I can't comment on that, but as I said in the post you cited, no one in the > > public has devices, and no one received any assistance with their > > applications. Either would be considered unequal support and would have > > disqualified them from the Challenge. > > > - Dan > > > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Steph A. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Let's take a closer look at the development team of the "Locale" app @ > > > MIT! > > >http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2008/google-android-0512.html > > > Interestingly these are the same teams earlier accused of having real > > > mobile phones: > > >http://boston.bizjournals.com/boston/stories/2008/01/28/story12.html > > > ...unofficially disclaimed here: > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge/browse_thread/thread... > > > > So now: Try to search them in facebook. > > > One of them is in "Google" network!! > > > But "Google" network members in facebook have to identify with a real > > > @google.com email address. Is that right? Guess who gets them... > > > Probably Google employees only. > > > > But were Google employees not eligible to participate in the > > > Challenge?? > > >http://code.google.com/android/adc-submit/tandc.html > > > (see 4. Eligibility) They do not exclude student workers. > > > > Am I right!? Please comment. Isn't that kind of unfair!?? Besides the > > > fact they had reportedly support of Google employees (see course > > > page). Please also take a look at the list of "Invited guests": > > >http://stellar.mit.edu/S/course/6/sp08/6.087/ > > > I really want to know, how many of them were judges, and how many > > > accompanied the teams before. > > > > Google: Please clarify, if all I wrote is just a wrong presumption. > > > And if so, how did she get into the Google network? > > > > Thank you. I apologize for any suspicions, if wrong.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Challenge" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
