Excellent points Alex, and congratulations on winning the challenge…

>>1) Basically, you're right, those problems exist and, for example, Commandro 
>>has some tricks inside it in order to correctly respond to missing signals, 
>>as well as it can be run as a background service (without UI at all) with 
>>minimal and rare GPS interaction in order to keep saving battery.<<

That’s my approach too.

There are a lot of tricks and shortcuts which need to be implemented
to make consumer LBS a realistic proposition.  My plan was to build
all of this into an intelligent platform (see Snowball), rather than
having each developer try and work it out on their own.


>>2) There are also some solutions on the hardware side which we hope will be 
>>used in new Android phones, such as u-blog highly sensitive low-power chips 
>>as well as increasing the number of signal processing correlators.<<

This hardware is in the pipeline, but don’t expect the fundamental
limitations of GPS to be solved any time soon.  Rule of thumb says -
technology in experimental chips now can be in phones in something
like a 3-5 year timescale.

Currently we have a big drop off in performance when comparing the
best dedicated GPS devices (say a TomTom) to a GPS enabled phone (say
an N95).  I expect this to be a problem for some time.


>>3) A sophisticated Location Provider created by Google which will be able to 
>>integrate the last known GPS position data with Cell ID approximations (when 
>>the phone is out of GPS range) can also become really helpful, do you read me 
>>Google? <<

Agreed, if Google want some expert consultancy on this issue then I’m
your man. ;-)

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Android Challenge" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to