now i understand the problem of adc 1 after taking a look at the judge list.
most of adc 1 judges are hw manufacturers; very few or none are sw app makers. imo, only *successful* sw app companies know what sw app will be commercially useful and valuable, and only them can know what/how sw apps can sustain the business in long term. so, maybe most of the non-winners have come to the wrong place if they intended to seek for an answer to whether their app will succeed business. without restructuring the judges, i dont think ADC II will be better judged. *imho*, for those (like me) who have submitted apps of "originality" ranked below top 25% or even below 10%, i would suggest tiny chance of winning adc 2, so the owners should stay away from adc ASAP and go directly for practical business execution if they still believe in their apps. if you still dream of $270k rewards, you should stay dreaming though. please dont accuse me of making mischief, because my suggestion is based on *reality*, goodwill as well as maximal benefits of app owners and most of mobile user base. cow! On May 16, 2:36 pm, ajd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here is the list of judges (some are from Sprint): > > http://code.google.com/android/adc_judges.html > > And here is a link that says "The Weather Channel" is a partner of > Sprint PCS: > > http://www.weather.com/aboutus/affiliates/internet.html > > Any significance? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Challenge" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
