On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 5:09 PM, q2dm1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I really am at a loss of words. Your application is obviously more > polished and mature than a large part of the winning submissions. How > can they expect to be taken seriously?
I really can't take the results seriously. We have a top design guy in the industry as part of the SlideME team and we expected to nail that criteria as well. We had plans for the ADC II but we decided its not much worth it. Shane > > > On May 17, 1:32 am, george_c <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Right! > > > > Here is our unpolished app: http://www.slideme.org/sam > > > > George > > > > > Effective use: In the 50th to 75th percentile of all submitted > applications > > > Polish: In the 50th to 75th percentile of all submitted applications > > > Indispensability: In the 50th to 75th percentile of all submitted > > > applications > > > Originality: In the 50th to 75th percentile of all submitted > applications > > > > > Overall: In the 50th to 75th percentile of all submitted applications > > > > > Hmm, I guess an application manager that delivers content to the device > is > > > not indespensible. Who would need that? Now I know the ADC judges were > > > smoking crack. > > > > > Shane > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Challenge" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
