On Oct 19, 6:47 pm, DanH <danhi...@ieee.org> wrote: > Even if you never actually execute the code that's causing the > problem, the verifier will reject it, since it's doing a static check > and can't tell what code is or isn't executed.
That's a pretty concise explanation of the difference between 1.6 and 2.0. In <= 1.6, if the verifier couldn't find a field or decided that you didn't have access to a package/private method, it would reject the entire class immediately. In >= 2.0, the verifier inserts an "always throw" instruction and verification continues. Nothing fails unless you actually try to execute the code in question. It looks like xcxin.mysecret.mainSecretActivity.processContact() is attempting to access a static field android.provider.ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.CONTENT_URI that didn't exist in 1.6. (In fact, I don't think ContactsContract existed in 1.6.) Some notes about backward compatibility can be found here: http://developer.android.com/resources/articles/backward-compatibility.html -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
