Hi,

No you are not obligated by the Distribution Agreement regarding
support or updates by my reading.

I just interpret some of it as suggesting that support of your apps is
desirable. And Dianne mentioned stuff that I was not aware. ( Nothing
could be supported for perpetuity ;-)

Version 1.5 vintage phones are likely to die off anyway as the normal
consequence of hardware failure due to age - battery won't charge any
longer etc.

Regards

On Jan 20, 10:48 am, Zsolt Vasvari <[email protected]> wrote:
> That cannot be right.  That would mean you have to forever support
> every version of Android.  And does the Distirbution Agreement talk
> about having to give the users updates and supports for perpetuity?  I
> doubt you are even required to give even a single update to your app.
>
> On Jan 19, 2:49 pm, gjs <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I'd also suggest rereading the Android Market Distribution Agreement
> > if you are withdrawing V1.5 paid apps & your support for them -
> > particularly given Dianne's comments about just bumping minSDK & old
> > versions still being available.
>
> > I think you may still have to provide refunds under some
> > circumstances, when you may have thought your V1.5 version was no
> > longer being distributed.
>
> > Regards.
>
> > On Jan 18, 9:48 am, Dianne Hackborn <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Huh.  Well it could well be, that was so long ago it is hard to remember. 
> > > :}
>
> > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 2:42 PM, String 
> > > <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > > > FWIW, I had the same experience, now that you mention it. Using @dimen
> > > > references in widget layout XML doesn't work on 1.5.
>
> > > > Bit of a PITA, but I just went ahead and created a few more layouts 
> > > > (rather
> > > > than resizing them based on dimens) and moved on. It didn't seem like a 
> > > > big
> > > > enough problem to seriously consider not supporting 1.5 for, and since 
> > > > it
> > > > was apparently fixed by 1.6, neither did it seem worth raising as an 
> > > > issue
> > > > anywhere.
>
> > > > I haven't had time to dig into the AOSP links you posted, Dianne, but I 
> > > > can
> > > > back Kostya up on this - it was broken in Cupcake.
>
> > > > String
>
> > > > --
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > > Groups "Android Developers" group.
> > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > [email protected]<android-developers%2Bunsubs
> > > >  [email protected]>
> > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
>
> > > --
> > > Dianne Hackborn
> > > Android framework engineer
> > > [email protected]
>
> > > Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to
> > > provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails.  All such
> > > questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see 
> > > and
> > > answer them.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en

Reply via email to