On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:15 AM, B M <iamvirt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am writing an application that will run on an Android device that
> will be used by developmently challenged individuals.  Some of the
> clients function at a toddler level despite the fact they are adults.
> For these clients, the application should remain running even when the
> 'Home' or 'Back' button is pressed.  Should the client break out of
> the application, they would not understand how to get back into their
> program.
>
> This application is the primary use for the device.  There were
> several inexpensive Android tablets shown at CES. The tablets are an
> ideal device to run the application.  The cost point of these devices
> make them affordable by the families of these clients.  The device
> essentially becomes an embedded device until a special code/gesture/
> etc. is performed.  The devices are purchased by people who *want* the
> device to be normally running a single application.
>
> I have read about the controversy of applications like ToddlerLock
> interfering with the expected UI Android provides.  While I agree that
> this is a really good thing in general, I believe there are times when
> a 'kiosk' mode is desired.  I see there are nasty hacks that subvert
> the 'Home' button.
>
> Is there a proper way in Android that allows an application to
> intercept/block the home button until a special code or gesture is
> performed?

Make it the home screen app.

-- 
Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy)
http://commonsware.com | http://github.com/commonsguy
http://commonsware.com/blog | http://twitter.com/commonsguy

Android Training in London: http://bit.ly/smand1 and http://bit.ly/smand2

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en

Reply via email to